Friday, 8 November 2013

How to stop Nick Griffin getting re-elected

I’ve just spent 10 minutes watching the cringe worthy ‘national treasurer’ Clive Jefferson and his crony sidekick Adam Walker on the BNP website. The short video is from the BNPs latest local fundraiser. This time they are raising money for Griffins deposit to fight next year’s euro elections.
There’s a lot at stake. If Griffin loses his seat they all lose their jobs. Believe me when I say that this is the big issue to them. As I’ve mentioned in previous posts the whole reason for getting European funding was to get on the Brussels gravy train. They will of all done very nicely out of it!


In this latest ‘comedic’ offering the lumbering imbecile that is Jefferson is trying to raise even more money by auctioning of Adam Walker. I mention this for one reason only as it hasn’t really got anything to do with this post. In the video a few in the audience ask what will Walker do for the person who wins him?  One member of the audience asks "does Walker come with a digger"- as in JCB presumably. Walker quick as a flash and with razor wire wit [I jest] "says did that word have a D or an N in it"
This is how moronic the BNP hierarchy are. Even when there’s a camera on them they can’t rein in their racist ‘wit!!
Can you imagine if any of these fools ever got any real power? It wouldn’t just be racist jibes [they call it non PC] this kind of mentality would become the norm, does anybody actually want that?


So anyway' the offshoot of this video is that Griffin has his deposit for next year’s election. I may have only been working for him briefly, but it was long enough to see what they were working on. Since 2009 the major and pressing concern for Griffin and his team was the next election. How to run it and how to win his seat. Re-lection is everything. A second term in office comes with large financial security.

I know I’ve written in the past that the BNP is virtually finished, and I still stand by that but’ the European elections are a very low turnout. This means that MEPs get elected with relatively few votes.
Griffins’ team may be socially inadequate, semi-literate buffoons, but they have been spending the last few years gathering details of their voters. The establishment dismisses these voters as racist.
Some will be, but many will be disenfranchised people who feel like no one is speaking for them. The very kind Griffin likes to groom into Ethno-nationalists.

Of course UKIP will take many potential votes of the BNP because they are addressing many of the same concerns. If anyone finishes the BNP in Europe it will be UKIP.
Griffin barely got enough votes to scrape through last time, and I honestly don’t think he will do it this time but, do we want to take the chance?


This coming election the main priority for the BNP is the postal voters. The one thing that held the BNP back pre-2009 was that they didn’t utilise postal votes.
The previous election guru or [as he liked to be known] was Eddie Butler. He refused to put any time into postal votes. He didn’t agree with the postal voting system and therefore would not encourage activists to sign people up.
If the BNP had encouraged more postal voters, I think they would have had more Cllrs pre-2009. 
Don’t think I’m saying the BNP would still be as big now. The BNP was massively destroyed by Griffins disastrous question time appearance and the power struggle that followed when all the little fish wanted to be in charge.

I have canvassed full estates and the support was amazing. Well over 50%. But it never swapped over to that amount of votes. Why? Partly because people don’t vote. Even the angry and let down won’t get of their backsides and go vote. So’ how do you get their vote counted? Postal votes.

This is why West Cumbria has bucked the trend. When the BNP vote was disappearing nationally, West Cumbria has stayed quite static. This is largely down to postal voting.
Also, it has to be said that the BNP canvasses more homes than the main parties. Labour, Tories and the Lib Dems have years of voting figures to draw on.
They have years of elections to know who, and where their voters are.
I’ve seen them on estates; while the BNP is knocking on every door because of the lack of voter information the 3 main parties only do the houses that they know where their voters live. 
If the BNP had pushed postal votes pre 2009 and activists had made sure that people signed up when they were canvased; I believe they would have had more Cllrs.
Good job it’s taken them a while to cotton eh?


So this is how they are going to fight it. Postal votes and canvass more than the other parties [assuming they can get the, manpower], but mostly relying on postal votes,they may already have signed up enough,but I doubt it.
So if the other parties want to stop them; here’s how to do it. It’s quite radical this mind.

Get off your backsides and canvass all the voters, not just your supporters. The BNP relies on the sad fact that many people have never seen a representative of any of the major parties for years. This very fact makes people feel un-represented and more open to Griffins message.
More importantly; do your job, represent all the people and listen to them. You are supposed to work for your constituents; all of them. Listen to their concerns and worries, and stop dismissing people as racists for having real concerns.

Told you it was radical![okay it was obvious-so why don't they do it?]

Also learn a lesson from Griffins disastrous question time appearance. Put him and his pals on the spot. Ask them the right questions. Show the public that these backward looking morons cant be trusted with any kind of public office. Don't just leave Griffin to put out his propaganda unchallenged.
The antifascists [who I admit Im no fan off] leaflets definately take votes of him,  but Griffin and Co need torn apart on policies as well. After all any popular policies that they have are just smoke screens for the real agenda.
Its all about colour!

Thursday, 7 November 2013

Accusations of being black ops!!!

I receive quite a few emails accusing me of being 'black ops'. 
For anyone who doesn't know this term, nationalist parties love to throw it around and label any dissenters as such. 
If I slag of the BNP, I’m either working for a rival nationalist party –or the state. If I slag of the English Democrats, I’m obviously covertly working for the BNP-or the state. If I slag of the left, I’m obviously still BNP or a racist or a fascist –and working for the state.
The far left just like the far right also have a love for conspiracy theories!
I even get accused of trying to get people to vote for one of the three main parties.


One thing you have to realise about nationalist parties [and their equals and opposites in the far left] is this. They all think that the state is this massive ‘clever’ entity that has whole departments concentrating solely on attacking and bringing them down. Whereas people who live in the real world know the truth?
The state, civil servants and their political masters are just idiots. 
These ‘many times’ self-appointed buffoons couldn't run a small tea room in Cumbria let alone run a country. But we seem to blindly think that these people are obviously the best for the job. We just disagree about which megalomaniac we want to screw things up next.  

So nationalist’s do you really think that the whole government is really set up to monitor you and bring you down. Do you genuinely believe that you are really that important? Or that they are purposefully trying to destroy this country.
To paraphrase 'Occam’s razor', the most obvious and simple answer is usually the right one.Is it not more likely that these self-opinionated, self-serving, money grabbing cretins with over inflated egos couldn't organise a drunken orgy in a brewery owned by prostitutes?

So just in case anyone thinks I’m Black ops [excuse me while I wipe away tears of laughter] let me set my stall out on what I think politically.


The Conservatives; a party ran by privately educated, nescient ,boobosie,sciolistic [I googled a few posh word for-idiot; just so if any of them read this they can put their expensive private education to good use] toffee nosed, socially detached hooray Henrys. 

There’s a massive clue in the name.

Conservative: Favouring traditional views and values; tending to oppose change traditional or restrained in styleThese fools care only about the people who already have the money. Such as their friends in the banks.
Mind you if someone like David Davis was in charge I think they would be a better party.



Labour: The pretend socialists! The only people these fools care about are the thousands and thousands that they have employed in the public sector. New Labour created a million more public sector jobs. Neither wonder we are snowed under with political correctness, health and safety and red tape. 
Thousands and thousands of unqualified paper pushers have to create work otherwise their jobs would become non-existent.
I’m not talking about front line staff I’m referring to the armies of middle class nobodies that are working behind the scenes and destroying the country even faster than their moronic political masters can.
All aided and abetted by their sleeping partners in the unions. 

I’m a strong believer in unions. I strongly believe in the working class fight for rights and better pay. But when was the last time we saw any union man fighting for the thousands of taxi drivers, builders, plumbers etc. 
When their political concubines’ that are new Labour’ opened the flood gates and let Britain be flooded with cheap Labour, where were the unions. Were they attacking British industry for favoring cheap migrant labor over home grown ? 
The unions then aided Labour in their witch hunt against anyone who complained about the mass immigration. Hes a racist-get him!
Its basic economics. The more freely available something is the cheaper it becomes; in this case casual labour.
Also Labour and their corrupt bed mates; the unions are the main backers behind the so called antiracist/fascist industry that exists mainly [not solely] to keep working class voters away from parties who rely on angry working class votes.


Lib Dems: Believe it or not I’m a liberal. I have liberal values, I've usually voted Liberal. I joined the BNP because I saw what was happening to our country and none of the three parties wanted to do anything about it; the Lib Dems included. So I thought I would join an outside party to shake things up a bit [yes I know; stupid!]

Who knows anymore what the Lib Dems stand for? They got into bed with the Tories.
But I can’t go too hard on the Lib Dems they have no track record of government to criticise or praise. They are in bed with the Tories and who knows what they are responsible for, good or bad. 
If you’re in a three legged race with a moron can you really be blamed when you go round in circles and keep falling over?


The BNP: I’m not going to bother boring you even more than I have. There’s dozens of previous posts about these kings of lunacy.


The English Democrats: Again’ I've covered these as well. In fact to be honest I’m not even sure if they are still a functioning party. I think they have gone the same way as Lord Such and the 'monster raving loony party'.


The Greens: I've always been a huge environmentalist. One of the reasons I attended a BNP meeting was because of my environmental worries. 
My main concerns were this. Millions of more people in the country means more homes, bigger cities, more cars, less greens spaces; in essence-the destruction of the British countryside.
As I've stated many times in previous posts neither myself nor millions of others have a problem with immigration- its mass immigration that worries us.

I agree with so much the Greens say but I believe they need to also tackle over population.
I was once privy to a conversation where a BNP candidate asked a Green candidate a simple question.
“The more people that come in the country means more homes, more cities, more concrete. You as a green where do you stand on mass immigration, more people or more concrete ?”. 
The green candidate [perhaps all too aware of the witch hunt that would be set against him if he answered wrongly] said “more concrete”.
I know of one green party member who left the greens because of that statement. But I still have more of an affinity with green policies than any other party

The SWP: I really won’t waste any time on these loons. Suffice to say that if idiots like this ever got power people who thought like me would be sent to re-education centres!!!  
Everyone must be familiar with the analogy of the political horseshoe. The BNP are at one end. The SWP [Stop The Cuts Coalition or any of the other tiny little groups that are connected to] are at the other. But it’s a horseshoe so the two ends of the shoe are very close to each other as are the ideologies.


UKIP: I did consider UKIP on my journey back from nationalism http://alistairbarbour.blogspot.co.uk/2013/09/from-nationalism-to-rationalism.html
But then common sense prevailed. 
I don’t mean common sense in the way that I woke up the fact that they are dangerous or racist. Even though left wing political anti-racist orgs would have you believe this.
But because I believe that society has to evolve. Britain used to have many kings. Each one in charge of his own piece of land. Over time these lands got consolidated [sadly usually after bloodshed] Time marched on and eventually the regions then countries came under one rule. We became Great Britain; the UK. 
I’m no historian [ I know enough to take a pub quiz ]and I know fine well that we are here now because of backstabbing and bloodshed that usually comes with the thirst for power. But we can’t turn the clock back. We are where we are-simple.

I think for the human race to evolve and prosper and above all stop blowing the s*** out of each other we need to integrate more. We need to modernise. The European Union is part of this evolution. It’s a shame that’s it’s ran by the same class of socially inept useless power hungry morons that run our own country.

I spend as much time as possible in the Scottish highlands and everywhere you go there are signs. ‘This new road was paid for by the EU’. ‘This environmental project was sponsored by the EU’.
There doesn't appear to be anything like that in England. Could it be that Scottish MEPs are busy fighting and debating to get what’s best for their country? Whereas England has too many UKIP MEPs. All sitting with their arms folded heads down and petulantly going “we don’t want to be here, so we are not going to join in”???


I can’t remember who said it but if voters concentrated more on making their political masters work for them rather than just voting for ‘the other party’ maybe we would get a better political system.
Me personally I would rather see 650 independents sitting in parliament with no party allegiances. But that isn't going to happen and where I live it has been Tory for ever and nothing will change- so I will keep on spoiling my ballot.

But I’m just a cynic and as the late great George Carling said “a cynic is just a disillusioned idealist”
SO that’s my political allegiances; none.

Tuesday, 5 November 2013

An atheists view of Islam.

Right here goes nothing. A white atheists view of Islam.
Christ I can hear the name calling already. Armies of apologists getting their typing fingers warmed up to attack me as a racist or Islamophobe.

After all in their eyes I must be one or the other. I can’t be a rational, modern liberal who abhors the partitions that religion causes between people.
I can’t just hate the brutality that is carried out in the name of some made up deity like god or Allah. Or’ I can’t be just a modern human being who doesn't see colour or race, but does see ignorance and stupidity. And I can’t just be modern free thinking person who sees that to marry your daughter of against her will, kill a loved one in the name of some backward idea of what constitutes honour, or to mutilate your own child because you think your daughter is a possession you can do with as you wish is absolutely inhuman, backward and downright ‘EVIL.


Forget culture or tradition and tiptoeing around sensitivities. Islam has many backward and downright evil practices [as has every religion] but’ at this moment in time you would have to be a fool to deny that a vast majority of barbarism, sexism, misogyny and terrorism is ‘on the whole ‘being carried out in the name of Islam.
Left wing appeasers and multicultural cheer leaders can deny this as much as they like but it’s a fact, and yes I’m well aware what is happening in Russia and Nigeria but this post is dealing with Islam.


If I knew an adult who believed in Santa I would be quite within my rights to take the mickey out of him. An adult who believes though that an invisible guy built this world,populated it with all us animals then took off and doesn't show himself; well that’s reasonable behavior isn't it?
Mind you I can take the micky out of the mad Christians and the left will say nothing. Lampoon the many mad far right bible thumping nut-jobs that are having a resurgence in the states and not a word from anti-racists. Have a go at Islam and’ oh hell- I’m Islamopobic and a racist.

The mind-set of orgs like the UAF and HnH exasperate all problems that we have. I’m not talking about rank and file supporters; I mean the organisers; the movers and shakers. They bring absolutely nothing to the table.
I’ve learned from my time in the BNP that you can’t judge everyone the same. Whether that’s members of the BNP, followers of the EDL, UAF, HnH or everyone who worships Allah.
It’s a pity the anti-racists can’t be this open minded?


So what does Islam mean to me?
One of the reasons I joined the BNP was because of Islam. This country is getting less secular, and many times it’s because we are bending over backwards to appease Islam.
The Church of England was, and is on its knees; that’s a good thing. No word of complaint from me or the left there.
But' political Islam was/is growing in strength. I know organisations like ‘Hope not Hate’ and the UAF deny this and dismiss all criticism as Islamopobia but it ‘did/does appear’ to be growing in strength.
Apologies for using the terms ‘is’, ‘was’ and ‘did’ and ‘does’ in such a way that I sound like I’m not sure either way. That's because sometimes I'm not’ but at least I’m being honest and admitting that many times I don’t know the full facts.

BUT’ I do know the perceptions, sometimes rightly or wrongly. In many cases it’s these perceptions that cause trouble. The only way to get rid of many perceptions is through open debate, free speech and criticism.

Islam to me was never about race. It was about morals and ethics.
Society has this ridiculous preconception that if you’re religious you are automatically higher up the scale of ethics and morality than us non-believers. In short you’re a better human being if you believe in a deity!

Just this week a terror suspect fled a mosque in a Niqab. All the media go to great lengths to point out that everyone who knew him was at a loss to understand his behavior and all pointed out that he was very devout man. They say this as if it was weird for a devout religious person to act like this.
Well Bin laden was devout and religious. As is Al-Qaeda ,the Taliban and  Al-shabab. So are the killers of Lee Rigby; need I go on, or do you get my point?
Every idiot that straps a bomb to himself is devout. Screwed in the head; but devout.

Of course Britain is full of many various nut jobs of different race, colour and religion. But the more that is done in the name of Islam the more we appear to bend over and to appease it.
Our political leader’s mentality appears to be “We know that atrocity does not represent Islam, so here take some more special privileges and our apologies for even doubting you”
Again this is a perception and not necessarily the case.

For every atrocity that happens, our political masters and the cultural apologists appear to bend over even further.  Determined that all Muslims should not be branded the same [and quite rightly] yet everyone who joins a political party like the BNP or marches with the likes of the EDL is obviously a racist; and always will be.

It’s these perceptions that get people angry. How much of it is real doesn't change the anger and distrust that people feel. 
It’s what they see and hear, it’s not necessarily what’s true.
All most people have to make up that perception is from the news. So forgive me if I say that it’s very rare that the news says something positive about Islam, and yes I know fine well that the media would rather publish negative stories.
Since I realised I had made a mistake by joining the BNP I do try my best to get an alternative view on most stories. I try to cut through any propaganda and see the truth. But what if you haven’t had my experience and have no reason to doubt what you hear and read? What if your only information is through the main stream media?
What if you’re so angry that you can only see the negative?


This article was not meant to insult any modern practicing Muslims. I am just trying to show the injustices that are dealt out to critics of Islam.  I've met and spoke to many decent liberal Muslims, in fact more decent ones than nut-jobs.

Britain is a multi-race country. It is far far better for it. It is without a doubt one of our strengths.
It is a multi-cultural society and again this very fact has benefited this little Island. But we have to be able to say that certain aspects that come with multiculturalism cannot and will not be tolerated.


To me and many people like me I would rather shout loudly at Islam and take the consequences if it stops one young girl being mutilated, prevents one beautiful young girl being killed by her parents and if it stops the persecution of the many decent ex-Muslims that I have spoken with, and am proud to class as friends.


Perceptions turn neighbors against one another. We need to grow up as a society and face this before it’s too late.

Friday, 1 November 2013

A recap on this blog.

When I started this blog in September 2012 I was a novice [I’m slightly better now]
I wasn’t sure how to get the circulation and to ensure it was read by as many people as possible. 
As times went by I must be getting better as the circulation greatly increases with each posting. So I thought I would post this easy recap of all posts up to date for new readers to browse back over and see if there’s anything of interest or use.

Introduction: A letter to Maryam Namazie at The Council Of Ex Muslims of Britain.

Multiculturalism divided we stand

Islamic hysteria =far right euphoria


BNP propaganda, comedy gold

Guardian poll. Voters would support anti-immigration party

Nationalist propaganda and victim status

If you want to live here, learn English. The absurdity of the citizenship test http://alistairbarbour.blogspot.co.uk/2012/10/if-you-want-to-live-here-learn-british.html

The symbiotic relationship between the far right and the far left

Propaganda instead of policies

British nationalists-born again Christians

Nationalism and culture

Nationalists and the BBC

It’s not just about terrorists

Political correctness human rights and the far right http://alistairbarbour.blogspot.co.uk/2013_01_01_archive.html

Nationalists and conspiracies

Guest article on the BNP and Muslim grooming gangs

The BNP undertaker

The Woolwich murderers and the far right

BNP plans Woolwich crusade

Griffin and Middle East dictators

UAF/BNP different sides of the same coin

Why can I not criticise Islam

The post-modern left and their continual attempt to link criticism of Islam as bordering on the Jewish annihilation in Europe

The cancer started in the West and went home

From Nationalism to rationalism

Am I left or right wing

Quilliam article 2010

BNP V EDL

What now for Tommy Robinson

A bit more on the BNP in regards to the EDL news

Nationalists and there obsession with homosexuality

We need a colour blind anti-racist organisation

Charlene Downes case reopened
http://alistairbarbour.blogspot.co.uk/2013/11/cherlene-downes-case-re-opened.html

Charlene Downes case re-opened.

No sooner had I put my previous post on the web about the hypocrites that are Hope Not Hate that  I noticed that they are at it again.

The daily mail is running an article on the Charlene Downes disappearance from 10 years ago. I wont bother going into detail as the link describes better what has happened so far

I then had a read of the Hope not Hate site to see what they had to say about it. http://www.hopenothate.org.uk/blog/insider

Go down to the tenth paragraph.
As usual HnH have put their blinkers on and refuse to see the injustice here. They would rather ridicule this woman.
This woman lost her child ten years ago. She has been let down by the system. Her private life should not factor into this. All that matters is a child lost her life and someone is to blame; that’s it, no more!

She is a grieving mother. Can any parent out there say hand on heart that to lose a child in such a way and then to be let down by the police would not send you into the clutches of the odious NicK Griffin.

I've previously mentioned how I met one guy who joined the BNP because his daughter had been raped by a Muslim gang and the police did nothing. He joined the BNP out of anger and hatred.

But to people Like Mathew Collins this doesn't matter. He should be ashamed of himself.

This kind of mentality that HnH show reminds me when the news broke of the Muslim grooming gangs. Lancaster unity ran an article on it and the comments were disgusting.
"No doubt these girls were begging for it" " white trash" "teasing sluts" " I bet these girls instigated it"
and far far worse.
To the guys credit [who ran the blog] he was furious with some of the comments. But none the less it shows the mentality behind many of these 'so called' ant-fascists.

We need a colour blind anti-racist organisation.

When Tommy Robinson turned his back on the EDL the so called anti-racist orgs were stunned. They were also at a loss as to what to do. The ridiculous named ‘unite against fascism’ remained silent. Searchlight voiced a word of caution, but at least stayed open minded as to how it would play out. Stating that the news was good but time would tell but tell if he had really renounced the ideals of the EDL'

The most shocked and by far the most vocal was Hope not hate. They didn't know what to do. One of their main reasons to exist had just thrown and enormous spanner in the works.
Regular readers of this blog will know that I have very little time for these groups. UAF are just violent appeasers of radical Islam and Searchlight and Hope not hate exist to solely go after ‘WHITE’ fascists, bigots and racists.


Hope not hate targets Anjem Choudry because he’s a safe target. He has very few followers so they aren't going to rock their own tiny little Utopian world view that the only bad guys are them nasty whites.
So’ when Tommy Robinson renounced the EDL you would have thought that these orgs would have being elated?
Not so though. They were shocked this has happened.  Robinson was being humanised in the media and this shook them to their foundations. Even worse was the fact that Quilliam had been instrumental in this process.
Hope not Hate in particular found it very hard to figure out where to stand on this. They need racists to exist, hell sometimes if there isn't any they will just invent some! But only white ones!


They wrote a very long winded cautious expose on Quilliam. They couldn't outright call Quilliam [after all their founders and main people are brown skinned-damn what to do] Also Quilliam ‘sadly ‘do not get as much support in the Muslim community as they ought to, and Hope not Hate need to prostitute themselves to where the biggest support is no matter if it’s right or wrong.


Unlike Hope not Hate Quilliam is forward thinking and not afraid to tread on toes. They are fully aware of the problems within Islam whereas Hope not hate ‘looking through its rose coloured glasses’ sees no problem at all with the misogyny, sexism, racism, bigotry, homophobia and cruelty laced within the Quran’; and before I get called an Islamophobe the bible is worse!

Hope not Hate are too busy worshiping at the altar of unreasonable multiculturalism. and their child like image of the world that everyone is good and difference never causes problems.
Tell that to the poor American student in tower hamlets last week who was brutally beaten up by a gang of Asians because ‘he didn't look local’ if that’s not racism then I must have a misunderstanding of what that word means.
Not one mention of this incident on any of the Anti-racist sites.

Likewise whenever a drunken ‘WHITE’ person is videoed on a train [sadly there’s been a few] racially abusing a non-white person Hope not Hate and searchlight are all over it.
Yet strangely the black guy that was videoed several months ago insulting another black woman because she had a mixed race baby never got a mention on their sites.
When Usain Bolt was getting slammed in Jamaica because he had a white girlfriend- not a mention. 
The video of an immigrant taxi driver being assaulted in Saudi Arabia [because he was not Arab] or the one of the servant been abused [again in Saudi] - not a bloody word from them. That’s just a few examples.

When I left the BNP and eventually started speaking out. One of the first people I spoke to was Quilliam. I worked on the article [mentioned several post previous]. I wanted to help crush the BNP so I sent it to the national newspapers to see if anyone wanted to run it. They all got back to me but they were not interested in reasons why normal rational people could drift toward fringe parties such as these. They all said the same thing.
They wanted the dirt on Griffin and Co. Pictures of Griffin and his henchmen running round the office in white robes with burning crosses.
I wasn't trying to finish the BNP by making stuff up. I was trying to finish them by showing the establishment that the BNP gets support because the political elite are ignoring a large section of society.
I have huge faith that the British people are not racist but as a society we need to face up to problems, real problems.


I did email hope not hate and spoke briefly to their 'token' reformed extremist Mathew Collins but that went nowhere. He took the hump because I had been willing to speak to anyone who would listen. But unlike Mathew Collins I wasn't trying to make cash of it. I offered information to anyone free of charge; in fact money was never ever mentioned. Also I couldn't turn round to them and say “I was a vile racist who has had an epiphany and I’m a changed person”
I was never a racist so how could I change?

Unlike the Hope not Hate evangelical ex-BNP/NF member who then went onto write a book and profit from his years of beating black people up, I decided to put mine on a blog! Free to anyone who could use it.
A few publishers did contact me wanting to know what I had, and if it was worth publishing. But I quickly came to realise that what I had was not sensationalist enough, it was just about one guy. Me; If I’ as a liberal minded non racist could gravitate towards the BNP anyone could. I really wanted to show how dangerous it is to ignore people’s fears and anxieties.  Plus at the time I wasn't too sure about the legalities of putting things on a blog-still aren't to be honest, that’s why I don’t mention names many times in this blog.

So here I am .writing for anyone who may be interested. Whether it makes the slightest bit of difference I have absolutely no idea. But one thing I’m trying to stay true to is the principle of fairness, A racist/fascist arsehole is a racist/fascist  arsehole no matter if he’s black white or brown, and I wish we had a colour blind antifascist/racist organisation that I could support.


Wednesday, 16 October 2013

Nationalists and their obsession with homosexuality.

Just watched Stephen Fry’s “out there”

For anyone who’s not familiar with it, this new series sees Mr Fry travelling the world trying to understand why so many people are threatened by two people of the same sex being together. In the programme he addresses the question. ‘Why are so many people obsessed about the biology of homosexual love making?’
They seem to take it as a personal affront. Two people engaging in a sexual act that does not comply with their own view of sex.


We've all heard and met the odd homophobic nutter, but it was only in the BNP that I saw it on a regular basis.
Griffin, Jefferson, in fact-all of the hierarchy. They’re obsessed with it. Too hear them talk it’s as if two guys had come up to them raped them or made them watch. Some of them with even the mention of homosexuality would spin out of control and start emitting such sounds of disgust; it really has to be seen to be believed.


There was one openly gay guy in the BNP. The leadership just used this guy as a token “look were not homophobic we have a one in our ranks” but behind his back it was ‘puff this’ or ‘faggot that’.
And’ as usual the BNP have a conspiracy for everything; even homosexuality.
They don’t just say we don’t agree with homosexuals. There has to be a far darker reason why they deplore them so much.
 ….”The Marxists are behind it. They are trying to destroy the family by turning everyone gay”.
 “They are purposely putting chemicals in our food to turn us all into raving queens”.
And the best one.
‘They are doing this only to white people in an effort to stop us 'whities' breeding and therefore die out!. Even David Icke doesn't think his lizard men are that bad !
To these idiots-Civil-partnerships, gay marriage, adoption by a gay couples, gay pride. All of these are used to neuter the white male and let them damned dark skinned people out number us. Then when they do 'god help us' they will be coming for us!
You really couldn't make this shit up


To nationalists ‘as usual’ the biggest culprits are the teachers. They are promoting homosexuality to help this pre-fertilisation genocide of ‘our race’. I kid you not.


They can’t see that no one is promoting same sex. Teachers are just promoting tolerance. There not telling kids ‘hey. be gay, it’s great’ they are just telling kids there’s nothing wrong with being gay. 
Huge difference.


Russia, Uganda, most Muslim countries and nationalists are all terrified of homosexuals.
I agree with the theory that when a man exhibits such fierce homo phobic vitriol it’s because he’s so damned scared of his own feelings and thoughts he has to be the one who shouts the loudest in condemnation. 

It’s embarrassing how thousands of men get so angry about this subject. What are they afraid of?  This same theory argues that these very same men may join such sub-cultures as football or motorcycle gangs, indulge in violence and lots and lots [far too much] of male bonding?
Perhaps most would be happier to just come out.


A very senior official [before he joined the party] was known to have enjoyed [how shall we say] adult parties. At these parties it was [again, how do I put this] ……acceptable practice to grab hold of the next person to you [male or female] and ………….enjoy yourself!
Apparently this is common knowledge in the area where he lives.


This very same official constantly talks about gays ‘a lot’ and says such things as “I don’t give a shit what gays do but they should keep it to themselves, it’s not bloody natural”
Well as far as I know, they do keep it to themselves…unless of course you buy the DVDs Mr official.
And hey, if parties like that float your boat good luck to you, enjoy yourself; but don’t be a hypocrite.
 


So Griffin, Putin and all the other homophobic politicians, Muslim leaders and African Christians; come out of the closet and enjoy life.
My apologies to the gay community. You maybe don’t want these sexually inadequate men anyways.


As usual regular readers of this blog will know that I’m no fan of so called antifascist organisations either. Where are they when homophobic Imams and ‘dark’ skinned world leaders are espousing irrational hatred against homosexuals?  

Ahh well there’s the rub.
They only ever attack white bigots; white Christian bigots.
As usual they are terrified [on the whole] to attack the large homophobic bigots that Islam is absolutely full of. Or the many African leaders who are trying to take their countries backwards.
But then again we can’t expect any more from this bunch of post-modern cultural apologist cowards that call themselves anti-fascists or anti-racists!


Wednesday, 9 October 2013

A bit more on the BNP in regards to the EDL news

Yesterday while everyone was watching Robinson, Carroll and Quilliam. I was watching Nick Griffin.

Several times I have stated that Griffin is insanely jealous of the EDL. He craves to be that kind of figure head, leading an army of 'angry white men'.
Since the EDL formed he has bounced back and forward from ridiculing them and calling them 'Zionist puppets' to holding out the olive branch in the hope of a merger.


It costs nothing to be a member of the EDL; there is no membership. Thousands of angry men 'thinking' they are taking affirmative action against radical Islam and paying nobody for the privilege. Griffin has been spitting feathers since their inception and all the money he could have made.


I've already said that Griffin will emulate the EDL next year. At the moment he is an MEP. This will come to an end next June. With the office of MEP and being a political party he has to operate within legal, moral and ethical parameters. Next year he will no longer have this restriction. He has realised that as politics go he and his fringe party are finished.
Bring on phase 2.Back to the days of street protests.


When he first started out he was National front. He was actually largely responsible for taking the protesters of the streets and getting them involved in politics.
He thought he could gain power and influence that way. That's all been for nothing. His party is virtually gone.
I think he will go back to the old days of marching and trying to provoke this race war he spends hours dreaming off.
He genuinely believes that this war is coming and he will carried aloft by the downtrodden 'white people of Britain' to save them in their hour of need. Lunatic!

He has tried to organise some street demos but they have been quite pathetic in their numbers. Like-minded People have had the EDL to march behind and he's ended up being stood on the sidelines, watching, fuming and thinking what may have been.

Even after the evil murder of Lee Rigby, Griffin couldn't summon up more than a few people. He tried to get people up for a march [with him at the front of a motorcade saluting and waving to his legion of admirers] but to no avail. A couple of dozen acolytes ended up showing up as he laid a wreath.
In comparison the EDL had mass protests all over Britain!

So will the EDL stay as it is or will it fracture into regional units? I think Griffin would prefer it broke up. He has already forged alliances with such EDL factions as the 'North West infidels' and the 'English volunteer Force'. He will be hoping to do the same again with any newly formed extremist groups.
If the EDL does remain as a national protest group he will desperately try to forge alliances with the new leadership. Of course this all depends who and if, anyone takes over?


Ironically the one thing that stopped Griffin and Co getting their dirty hands on the EDL was Robinson and Carroll. They would have nothing to do with him. Well now they have gone and just watch this space.

What now for Tommy Robinson?

Tommy Robinson and Kevin Carroll have left the EDL. SO’ what now?


I’m not privy to any information about the whys and wherefore about how this happened [despite the timing of my post on Monday; purely coincidental] but all I can say is ‘if they are genuine’ good luck to them. They are working with the forward thinking ‘Quilliam foundation’ that will mentor and guide them on another path.  After all who better to guide someone away from an extremist organisation than someone who were once themselves members of extremist organisations?


I watched Robinson on ‘Newsnight’ and thought he came over well. But’ I didn't like what he said about halting Muslim immigration. That’s the last thing we should be doing. We need to continue welcoming refugees and asylum seekers from anywhere, but we must insist that they leave their cultural baggage where they fled from.
By this I mean archaic customs such as Sharia law, Forced marriages, FGM and other such Stone Age practices, that we in the west 'should' find abhorrent.
We need to get past culture. It’s about acting as 21st century human beings. The only question immigrants need to answer.
Do you want to live in a secular, free, equal and modern society?

 

So now it all depends what Tommy Robinson’s politics are as in how he casts of his past?
If he joined Labour his past would be forgiven overnight. EX BNP and NF members appear to have become extremely clean by supporting them? They can even write books about the violence they participated in towards black and Asian people. But because they have adopted and embraced the post-modern cultural apologist mantra of unrestricted multiculturalism they are clean.
The left never expose ex far-right people in the ranks of Labour, but will use them joining another party to attack it. After all Anti-fascist organisations are strongly linked to the unions and the Labour party. That’s a fact.


Whilst in the BNP I saw how these organisations worked. They undoubtedly do parties like the BNP harm but first and foremost they are political. I've already mentioned that the Tories and liberals treat me [on the whole] well. The bile and hate that comes from Labour and their political partners has to be seen to be believed.
I still get some now just walking down the street by some antifascist Muppet who doesn't know I quit, and I’m only know in my town. Robinson and Carroll have national recognition.


The antifascists leaflet on behalf of the unions and Labour. After all, its Labour votes that the BNP was taking, because it was the working classes that had been let down by Labour. None of the other parties ever put third part leaflets out against the BNP. They tended to take on the BNP directly. The way it should be done.   


The antifascists need an enemy. It was mentioned in the Quilliam press conference that Robinson may be setting up a new political party. If he is a threat to Labour votes he will find himself back under the antifascists radar, and if he even mentions immigration or any questions to do with Islam, again  he will find himself back in the spotlight as a fascist.

There is nothing wrong with having these conversations but we are, and need to be very cautious about who is having them and why?
That is not a veiled word of caution about Robinson. That should apply to anyone. It’s not about the conversations and questions we should be having.  It’s about the agenda behind them.


Also’ Just a word on Griffin! I mentioned in the previous post that Griffin loses his seat next year. No more money, very few members.
I said he would move more to the EDL strategy of street protests. Well I think he may have been forced to move his grand plan forward after Tommie’s resignation. He is falling over himself on all social media to get as many EDL over to him as possible.
Some will no doubt go over to the BNP. But many will go the same way as the BNP when it fractured a few years ago. Lots of little wannabes setting up different groups, fighting each other for supremacy.


Monday, 7 October 2013

BNP v EDL

I know I said in a previous post that I would no longer be following the far right to see what they are up to; and I stand by that. I've stopped trawling the BNP sites for stories, as there just isn't any. Add to this the fact that they are virtually finished as a political entity. But’ this is just a generalisation and not a direct observation relating to one specific event. 


The EDL pose a greater threat to social cohesion than the BNP. 

The BNP has a leader, it has a chairman. As inept and useless as he is he has to try and play the PR game. They are a political party and have to operate within certain legal parameters. Although the party is full of racists and Nazis he has to keep them hidden; or at least try. He knows fine well that if a long steady stream of pictures with shaven headed jackbooted thugs, giving dodgy skyward salutes and sporting strange tattoos; his voter base will go down even further [which is getting hard to comprehend as it’s virtually disappeared] 


At the moment Griffin holds an office as MEP, which is almost certain to evaporate at next year’s elections. I think when this happens he will attempt to emulate the EDL and try to build a street movement similar to what they have.  He is insanely jealous of their support. Even though their's has diminished, it still remains far larger than the BNPs. 


But for the moment he has to play the politics game. They cannot be seen to be stirring up racial tensions too much. 

To use the BNP name you have to be a member, with this comes rules. So on the whole activity throughout the BNP is relatively uniform. If an ex-member or an outsider attempts to use the brand name BNP they will be sued. 

Griffin owns brand BNP! 


In the opposing corner we have the EDL. Stephen Lennon is not a leader; he’s more of a figure head, a spokesperson. There is no membership. No enforceable code of conduct and no fear of being kicked out or indeed sued for using the name EDL. So unlike the BNP the EDL comprises of self-governing autonomous groups. These could be groups consisting of genuine people who have a valid and genuine concern regarding political and radical Islam. Or they could be groups consisting of Nazi thugs or racist bigots. Who have seen this street movement as a good excuse to blame Muslims and indeed all foreigners for all Britain’s ills? 

There are so many factions now it’s hard to keep track. 


So’ when a large protest is organised with divisions coming from all over the country it’s not surprising that there’s trouble. Many times EDL factions fight among themselves, and I understand that Lennon himself has attacked Nazis within the ranks. Throw into the mix the equally odious UAF and it’s a question of lighting the taper and run like hell. 


So do even the decent members [and there are bound to be some] of the EDL make the whole Islam question worse.

Yes’ there is no doubt they do. If you live in a Muslim community [mind you there should be no Muslim communities; just communities] and you see hundreds of white males marching and chanting often fueled with alcohol what are you going to do?


You’re not going to take a step back and think ‘hold on do these guys have a point’ no you will be pushed farther into your community.Where the the radical preachers can then go to work on you. As you do this the wider community feels even more threatened and round and round it goes.


In my opinion if the EDL founders really want to make a difference and fight political Islam. Put down your beer and your flags, disband the EDL and take another course of action. I’m pretty sure someone with such a high profile as Stephen Lennon would perhaps be taken a bit more seriously if he did this.


It would also go a long way into defusing tensions in neighborhoods as well. And it would allow the police to put more time and effort into tackling Islamist terror cells.Take one extremist group off the streets, save the tax payers money and also take away some of the victim status the Islamists crave.


There are many legitimate  groups taking on radical Islam and winning. Support these and really help make a difference!


Saturday, 5 October 2013

Am I left wing or right wing? Help me someone.

I wrote this a few weeks ago and seeing as how Mehdi Hasan has declared war on the daily mail, and they in return, on him; I thought this would be as good a time as any to put on my blog.

There is a mind-set that you have to be in one political camp or another. You have to be right or left wing. Most people are neither but in many cases the politicians, policy makers and people who have real influence on society are. Quite often the worst offenders are the political activists both online and in the real world.

If your right wing you have to have a go at ‘liberal democracy and ‘woolly minded liberals’ [Their words, not mine]
If your left wing you have to arrogantly look down your nose at anyone that doesn't believe in a bloated state and public sector.

This mind-set even tries to dictate which newspapers you should read.
If your right wing you have to despise the guardian and dismiss everything that’s in it as PC, Britain hating, claptrap, and that these people can’t get out of bed in the morning because of a lack of a backbone.
Likewise if your left wing you have to sneer constantly at anyone that reads the daily mail. Dismissing them all as nutters, racists and closet Nazis!

Well here’s a question. What if you read both papers online [and many others]several times a week [I wouldn't buy them because I don’t want to help them peddle some of their rubbish, plus I quite often have to Google a DM story to see if its true, recent or even relevant]

So does what I read make me a lefty, pc, woolly liberal, Britain hating, patriotic Nazi, racist, bigot?
Wow what would one of them look like?

For some reason to be a ‘socially conscious nice human being’ you have to attack papers such as the DM as often as possible. If you don’t well obviously you’re a right wing nut-job.

Similarly the Guardian; according to the right wing ‘Is read by lentil eating, humus smelling goat breeders who drive Citroen 2CVs and live in their own hair’.

So ‘my argument is this. How on earth can you get a realistic perspective on life if your information comes from one socio-political base?

No newspaper is totally bad. If you only ever read the daily mail ‘god help you’.
It must be hard to get out of your bed in the morning because of all the Muslim terrorists, African rapists and Romanian muggers hiding behind your bins. That’s assuming you have a bin because of all the unemployed scroungers and refugee’s that may have stolen it!

Likewise’ If you read nothing but the Guardian.  Again ‘god help you’. You must believe that Britain is responsible for all the worlds’ ills and terrorists are just misunderstood freedom fighters and there’s a government conspiracy behind everything.


Sometimes the very reason a newspaper runs a story is to prop up its political bias. But if the story is true it doesn't matter who publishes it. It’s still true.

Monday, 30 September 2013

From Nationalism to rationalism.

In this blog I've tried to show at length how and why someone would join the likes of the BNP.
When you get angry and despondent enough with the political system your ears begin to open to anyone’s message, no matter how bigoted it may be.

But what about the journey back. The one that takes you back to the real world. The world of human beings rather than flags and culture.

When I realised the BNP was not for me. That their message was full of intolerance and bigotry. I didn't just think “phew that was a lucky escape” and walk away with a completely different mind-set.
It’s not that easy.

When I got angry and joined the party, with membership came the propaganda .The flag, St George, over infatuation with historical events etc.
I have to admit I never really bought into any of it, but it was expected so I kind of went along with the flow. And yes up to a point I did fall for some of the crap.

So what do you do when you walk away? Just go back to normal life.
No you feel like ‘okay I got that wrong but I still feel strongly about many things that they feel about’. So after a time of readjustment I decided to get active again. I saw a video for the English Democrats. With the slogan ‘were not right not left just English’. Hmm they seem more up my street; maybe I shall give them a go.

So I joined them. After all they were still nationalists but without the racism?[or so I thought] This brief alliance lasted only a few months. Luckily for me the BNP started to implode and many of the hierarchy jumped ship to this party. The way that they were so easily accepted proved to me that British Nationalism or English Nationalism, it didn't matter, both were backward and regressive. So I was politically homeless again.

A few months go by then there was a UKIP meeting in my city. Off I went to this. 
‘Could these be the ones? Definitely not racist. Just wanting away from the European Union and all the rubbish that comes with it!
This relationship was even shorter. I quickly came to the conclusion that it was just a club for Euro skeptics who didn't really do anything. No local politics no campaigning etc.It was anti-Europe but really didn't have any plan for after Europe.

Now many people will call me for all this jumping ship. But to me it was learning curve and in a way ‘deprogramming’ I was venting all the anger I still felt against the political elite but in a more positive way. After all I had gone from the openly racist BNP to the covertly racist English Democrats, then to the Europhobic UKIP. Even if there were somewhere else to go- I had had enough!

When I left the BNP in disgust I had to re-evaluate myself. I had to find what my politics were. I can imagine it’s what someone who has just turned their back on religion must do. You won’t just wake up one day and think well that’s all a crock of shit isn't it. Smile and get on with your life.
I should imagine many people have to go on a journey until they find something they are comfortable with. Thought processes are not that easy to get rid off. No matter how short a time you've nurtured them.

The reason I started this blog was to try and show that nationalism in any form no matter how watered down, is bad. It’s divisive regressive and holds us as people back.

Flags are just pieces of coloured cloth. Culture is just something that our parents and grandparents have instilled into us. More often than not this too is divisive and regressive as well.
Religion; well that is just the most evil control structure that mankind has ever come up with.
All of these do one thing and one thing only. They separate us from our neighbors. From our cousins in other countries. And most of all from peace, both within ourselves and in the wider world.

One final thing does this mean I’m a sell out and that I've changed my political ground from right to left. No not at all.
I’m neither. I was never right or left to start with. We want to put people in boxes. Left or right. Why?
I want open borders, free movement of people an EU that is not corrupt and is democratic. But unlike the post-modern left and cultural apologists I’m a realist.I take into account human nature, and don't think every single immigrant that comes here wants to live in a free society.Or that we have to bend over backwards to accommodate stupid archaic belief systems.
These idealistic fools have created most of the problems we face in the west, mass immigration ,Islamism to name but two.And the most most divisive issue of them all; multiculturalism. I would rather Britain was a nation of people, just people. Not a nation of White communities,Black Communities or Muslim communities.

Wouldn't it be good if rather than people taking extreme sides of the argument? We could actually put our efforts into finding solutions that work?
To paraphrase the so called civic nationalists of the ‘English Democrats’.
I’m not left not right just human.

Tuesday, 24 September 2013

The cancer started in the west and went home to the east.

A few years ago I cruised down the Nile River. Doing the usual tourist things. Temples, ruins and running the gauntlet of sellers that set up stalls between every tourist attraction and the boat. Anyone who has done this trip will know exactly what I mean. Walking past all the sellers and trying not to catch ones eye or you’ve had it. Within seconds you will have headscarves, incense burners and leather camels hanging of you.
I Loved every minute of it and never spent a Gineih.

I perfected very quickly the air of arrogance and strength that you need to give off for them to leave you alone. My wife however was not that lucky. It took her ages to realise that if you even said ‘no thank you’ they would see that as a positive sign and follow you home.
It’s the equivalent of a double glazing salesman over here putting his foot in the door.

On the boat we had a resident Egyptologist who was also quite a devout Muslim. One night whilst slowly cruising down the Nile with all the mosques starting to echo the call to prayer we got into conversation about Islam.
I asked him about what he thought of women wearing the full face veils. He just laughed and said “they are lazy” How so I asked.
Still laughing he said they can’t be bothered to do their hair or makeup before they face the world.
I took this as a positive sign that we could have an open and honest debate about Islam; and we did.

He asked me is it right that your country is full of Imams preaching hatred.
“Not full but definitely more than we know or should have” I replied.
“Do you know why Britain is full of backward looking Imams” he said
He followed on with.
“Because we kick them all out of Egypt and you fools take them in”
Before anyone starts saying that Egypt has them also he was just trying to emphasise a point.

He then went onto explain that his Islam is not their Islam. By them he meant the bearded fire
brands that are taking Islam back a thousand years.
Most significantly he told me’ that their Islam is a cancer that is being grown in the west and spreading home’, and that government in the west need to treat the cancer now.
This trip was in 2008 and sadly Britain is exporting even more terrorists all over the world. The White widow [Samantha Lewthawite] has reportedly been killed in Kenya. After her and her bunch of murdering religious retards murdered 69 innocent people!
All in the name of one of the many fantasy's [religions] that has tarnished mankind for over two millennia.


Twice I've now had the pleasure of going to Egypt. I did Cairo in 98 and loved it. I hope I get to go a third time but until the world comes together and treats Islamism for the disease that it is and stamps it out .Sadly’ I honestly can’t see me going anywhere near the place.

Monday, 23 September 2013

The post-modern left and their continual attempt to link criticism of Islam as bordering on the Jewish annihilation in Europe

We hear it all the time from them and many Muslim commentators. BBC live’ on Sunday morning had an Imam on saying the very same thing.
They constantly say that the rising wave of criticism against Islam is the same as the vile hatred that the Nazi regime used to build up fear and hatred of the Jews before they murdered 6 million of them.
In other words. We have to stop criticising Islam or we could end up doing to the Muslims what Hitler did to the Jews.
Absolute rubbish.

This is just another weapon in the vernacular of the post-modern left that appeasers of political Islam use to try and quiet dissent. Along with racist, bigot and Islamophobe.

How the hell does criticism of some aspects of Islam equate to the atrocities committed against the Jews.
The holocaust was  one of the darkest stains in modern human history and the victims should be treat with the dignity that they deserve. For someone to constantly equate other minor events with it, is frankly an insult to the people put to death in part because of their religion.
Remind me again who is committing acts of murder all over the world because of religion?

Many on the left are so convinced that if we openly criticise anyone of race or religion that it’s only a matter of time before we start rounding people who are different to us and shipping them of to be killed. Just like is happening right now in Kenya.
Again’ Sorry, remind me who is doing this atrocity. Oh yeah, radical Islam,,,again!
The only time people would be killed for their religious beliefs in this country would be if cretins like Bakri, and Choudary and political Islam got its way and got to fly their black flag above parliament.

The left wing did the very same with the gypsies camped illegally at dale farm. They tried to make everyone else the villain. Left wing fire breathing dragon Vanessa Redgrave attempted to make exactly the same nightmare scenario about the travelers.
With tears in her eyes she pleaded with the authorities to stop the eviction. "Look what Hitler did to the gypsies in WW2 .we cannot allow this to happen again"

So because of that crazy mentality and what one regime did we are supposed to just allow gypsies to pull up anywhere and do as they wish.
No of course we shouldn't. We have to stop this defence of people just because they belong to a minority.

Sometimes that minority can be wrong and we should be allowed to say so without psychotic members of the left accusing us of wanting another holocaust.

Why can I not criticise Islam?

Is it because I am white?

One of the reasons I even gravitated to the far right [briefly] was because of the anger this kind of moronic thinking sets in you.
Just last Thursday on question time, Laura Penny from the new statesman came out with usual left wing claptrap.
‘If your white and not a Muslim and if you criticise the Niqab you’re a racist’.
Moronic overtly PC clap trap like this are one of the reasons people get so angry.
Should we use that argument with the Catholic Church pedophile scandal? After all I’m not a catholic so what right do I have to an opinion on the matter? Oh hold on’ I will now be told that Catholicism is not a race.
Well guess what neither is Islam.

The reason we have a problem in this country with Islam is not necessarily with Islam itself. But because of all the left wing appeasers who label any voices of descent as racist or bigoted.
These very same people would no doubt cheer when the late George Carling would rip the holy water out of Catholicism. Or Dave Allen would parody the pope.
So why the double standard’s when it comes to Islam.

To me, these left wingers are racist. They act like an over bearing parent who is critical of anyone that chastises their child. They think they are better and more superior to the people that they pretend to protect. They are showing an astounding sanctimonious arrogance.

A few years ago whilst out canvassing I met one lady. She was very nice and engaged me in debate. She asked me 'why I hated black people so much’.
I was taken aback and said ‘I don’t hate black people, in fact I don’t hate any people’.  
She then went on to tell me that she used to work in Africa [she did say the country, but it escapes me now]. She told me that she used to work there as a teacher and ended up adopting one of her students and brought them to live in Britain to at least give one of them a better life. A most honorable and human thing to do. And I told her so.

She then went on telling me that when she lived in Africa. She would be quite often shouted at in the street by the locals. They would call her whitey and sometimes worse.
I asked her how it made her feel.  
She said that for white people to shout abusive words at black people was wrong and there was never an excuse. Complete agreement from me there.

She then came out with one of the most racist remarks I've ever heard.  
She said that for white people to abuse someone because of their colour was wrong, but for black people to abuse a white person in the same way is still wrong but we have to understand ‘that they don’t know any better’

This arrogant and patronising mind-set is what is wrong with many left wing thought processes in the west.
In many cases it is they that need to start treating all people regardless of race colour or faith as equals.