Saturday, 15 December 2012

It’s not just about terrorists.

One of the main concerns I had when I attended my first BNP meeting was creeping political Islam.
Where I live in the Cumbria we have very few problems associated with fundamentalist Islam. In fact Gordon Brown stated that Cumbria is ‘hideously white’. How insulting to this area, he made it sound like Cumbria is full of racists. No wonder the BNP made such ground up here. Not because we are racists but because new labour made it sound like we should be ashamed because we don’t have as many black/brown immigrants as other places.
Again' labour doing the recruiting for Griffins propaganda machine!

We may not have the same ethnic mix up here but we do have the same media as everyone else and you would have to be blind not to see what is happening in other parts of the country and more worryingly in other parts of the world with political Islam.

For years the news has been dominated by events in Islamic countries and the effects of what happens in the name of Islam. Obviously there are many reasons for injustice, intolerance and violence around the world, but you cannot escape that a disproportionate amount of it is happening in Islamic countries or in the name of Islam. Many on the left use the argument ‘but we have done far worse in our history’. This may be true, but it’s in the past.  Are we supposed to allow arse-holes to behave in such a way because other arse-holes behaved like that in the past?

It’s not just the terrorist acts of 9/11, 7/7. There has always been and sadly there always will be acts of violence perpetrated by ideological cretins. Not just in the name of Islam but also for the backward causes of nationalism, racism and many other prejudices and bigotry's.  When it comes to Islam ‘though’ it’s not the terrorism that worries me and many like me, but more importantly it’s the sexism, homophobia, misogynism and ‘far too often’ violent and sadistic treatment of people in the name of this religion.
Female genital mutilation, forced marriage, so called honour killings [to me one of the worst crimes there is. To kill a loved one because of your own pathetic retarded Stone Age belief system and that this act will somehow restore your honour. This is evil]

Can anybody blame any rational right thinking person for not wanting to import this kind of backward and regressive thinking into our country.

I approached the major parties with my concerns and they all went into overly PC mode.
They all denied there were any problems and that it was imaginary and they all reverted to the usual rhetoric
“Islam is a religion of peace and there is much we can learn from it and the vast majority of Muslims are not interested in fundamentalism and extremism”

At the time I remember thinking “okay show me the evidence”, where are your facts and figures to back up this statement. This statement appears to have become a mantra for the major political parties and many on the left and if you don’t agree with it your racist or Islamophobic!

As I've already said it’s not about the terrorism. As I write this the news is coming in from America about the horrendous killing of children at a school in Connecticut. 
There will always be evil people and as a society we need to push them too, and keep them on the fringes. Take away there power where they can do as little harm as possible.
This obsession with multiculturalism though has seen the importing and tolerance of barbaric practices into this liberal country.
We now have Sharia courts sitting in the UK. A system that has absolutely no bearing or right to be in the modern world. The modern world should be built on man-made rational laws not Stone Age archaic beliefs systems that were made for that time [and not even fit for then]

There is no doubt that nationalist parties are drumming up anti-Islamic feeling for their own backward ideology. They do deserve the mantle of Islamophobic.
But many organisations on the left use this terminology all too freely to attack anyone they see fit.
They seem to be stuck in this mind-set that minority’s need defended no matter what; even if there are some things about that minority that is unacceptable. They brand far too many people who have concerns about Islam as Islamophobic.  

So the left fight for minorities! But’ what about the minority within that minority?
What about the young girls been genitally mutilated?
What about the inherent bigotry that goes with any religion? ‘My religion is the right one therefore I'm more superior to you because you believe in the wrong god’.
What about the minority, made up off young girls been forced into marriage against their wills?
And what about the many women trapped in a societal cage that they would love to break free from if only we had not encouraged and allowed different communities to shut them away from mainstream society so as it has harder for integration to take place.

These organisations seem to be very choosy which minority they fight for!
They should be at the forefront and being vocal about homophobia, sexism and misogynism in any part of society; main stream Islam included. You should defend minorities but not at the expense of basic human rights and common sense!

Hope not Hate published a report on line several months ago [the counter-jihad report] 
In this report they had the obvious and very real racists and bigots such as the BNP but among the major players they also had Baroness Cox;
Why? Because she was campaigning against Sharia law.
This was altered within a few days of going on-line and her name was removed.

They also in their opening statement in this report state that growing Islamophobia in the USA has already resulted in banning Sharia law in several states. They say this is as if it’s a bad thing.

Organisations such as these are no doubt well-meaning and do a hell of a lot of good work
combating the growth of parties such as the BNP but they appear to have this mind-set that that if you speak of the same problems that the BNP speak of you must be an Islamophobic bigot as well.

This Islamophobic term is doing so much harm. Yes the BNP and many of the other nationalist movements are undoubtedly Islamophobic, but most people who speak out are just rational citizens.

In my time in the BNP I stood for election a few times. Knocked on hundreds if not thousands of doors and spoke to just as many in the streets. Very rarely did I hear a racist comment. Very rarely did I hear anyone say that they wanted to stop immigration or kick people out. Most people where concerned with 'MASS' immigration and communities integrating.
But it has to be said that when people did express any worries about any immigrant community it was always the same, Islam and Muslims!

For far too many people the whole issue of immigration and any negative aspects of it has become synonymous with the Islamic community.

Immigration is again being debated, this time by the Labour party. The same party that allowed unlimited mass immigration and is responsible for making it such a divisive issue. As usual they are making it sound like all problems would disappear if everyone spoke the same language.
Do they really think it’s that easy? 
Do they really think that all the problems are coming over with new immigrants and it’s because they don’t speak English?

Most of the terrorists have been born in the west. Fools like Anjem Choudary and most of his band of inadequate men were born here and speak perfect English. But it’s these idiots who are pushing for Sharia law.

Of course everyone who lives in the same country should be able to communicate with each other, but it’s this infatuation with multiculturalism that is causing division.
Britain is a modern and diverse society. The 2011 census states that we are the most diverse society in Europe. That we have the highest percentage of mixed race children. This is all excellent news for Britain and makes it the modern country that it is [It’s only the nationalists who want to see Britain full of white people. Most people just want to see Britain full of decent people] but we have to be able to criticise the elements that we don’t want here and we need to fight vigorously for EVERY person and stuff ethnic or cultural sensitivity’s.

Friday, 7 December 2012

Nationalists and the BBC

For the last few months one story has been dominating the headlines; Jimmy Savile.
It turns out that this freak has been abusing kids for years, and getting away with it [it amazes me how anyone who looks that weird could have even be allowed near kids in the first place but that’s another issue]
No doubt the investigation will run for a long time yet and it will be a while before we hear exactly what he and his sick friends were up to.

For months the BNP has been trying to make political capital on the back of the grooming gangs that I mentioned in a previous post.
They went to great lengths to draw attention to the fact that the grooming gangs in question were Muslim and that this perverted crime is only perpetrated by Muslims.
They tried their best to cast distrust between communities and to stigmatise Muslims in particular.

So what’s the nationalist take on the Savile story?
Well they certainly aren't focusing on the perverts colour this time. Nor are they concentrating on his ethnicity, religion or cultural background.

They can’t focus on his colour; he is white. They can’t focus on his origins, he is British or his religion [Roman Catholic]. Chances are most of his co-accused are also white.
Not much a nationalist can use there?

They have spent months trying to vilify the whole Asian community because of the actions of some perverted excuses for men.
They targeted these because they were not white British. So now we have a case involving white Anglo Saxon perverts. The BNP can’t target that community! Luckily for them though Savile worked for the BBC so they attack that instead.

Political parties like the BNP hate the BBC. Well to be accurate they hate the media but the BBC in particular. They really do believe the BBC is an organisation dedicated to destroying everything that is British /English.
Everyone knows that the BBC is left leaning but to Nationalist parties they have invented something much much darker. They believe the BBC is run by Marxists, communists and traitors. With one aim, to destroy Britain/England!
They dedicate masses of their propaganda machine against the media and particularly the BBC. To them everything the BBC does is a cold calculating plan to brainwash the populace. To these fools a socially aware programme about the third world or injustices in a foreign land becomes a concerted effort to manipulate the people [or sheeple as they like to call the great British public] into being more open to liberalism and globalisation.
Nationalists can see a conspiracy in an empty room where only they are present!

In typical nationalist style though parties like the BNP are not only paranoid but they are also thick.
If they are convinced that media has it in for them surely they would go on a charm offensive to show them their supposed true side [well put on a charade].
I was present at the BNPs Euro election launch in Manchester. The place was packed with reporters from many of the main media outlets; the BBC being one of them.
Firstly Griffin gets up on the stage and insults the media, reserving his most paranoid vitriol for the BBC. He proceeds to tell them that they are Marxists and traitors and are betraying Britain with their Liberal views. All of this verbal vomit is lapped up by many in the audience. Calls of scum and such like are called out; all directed at the BBC crew present. I was sitting beside them and could see quite plainly the looks of astonishment on their faces.
So why does griffin taunt the media so much?

Surely an intelligent man would go on a charm offensive and try to get good press.
This ‘however’ is not the way that Griffin operates. He knows fine well that the likes of the BNP will never get into power the democratic way. Yes they may get lots of people who are worried about some of the same things that they campaign on but the British people aren't interested in nationalism.
He knows that the BNP will never get enough votes and thus enough people elected.

In this instance like many others he was baiting the press not for the outside world but for the people in that room.

His whole motive is to keep playing the victim card and hope that the other parties keep screwing up [and sadly they do]. He longs to build a street army of loyal activists and thugs. This is one of the reasons he hates the EDL leadership. He would love to have that many street soldiers as the EDL had at its height.
Griffin is desperately trying to get these EDL supporters to swap allegiance to the BNP instead. 
He really believes that one day these race riots ‘he so longs for’ will happen then he and his army of semi intelligent paranoid thugs can take to the streets and drum up real support. This is his real objective.
Not to get voted into power but to sweep in on the back of major social unrest. To get enough support that he can become a power broker.

Nationalists who are against Griffins leadership believe he is running the party down because he is working for the state! Pro or anti Griffin, there's a conspiracy to cover all angles!
Nothing is as it seems to a nationalist, everything has a conspiracy attached!

Griffin’s term as an MEP is up in 2014. He then has to campaign be re-elected.
Already his victim machine is in overdrive. He has organised demo's outside mosques, council chambers, the BBC and anywhere else he thinks these bogey men Marxists hang out.
When the election is due and he gets his free mail shot to every voter in the North West he can then show them how he and he alone has been fighting to defend them against this legion of traitors [in his head]. 

At the moment he doesn't stand a hope in hell of being re-elected, but if the main party’s don’t deal with ordinary people’s real concerns the tide could again turn in his favour.