Guest article on BNP and Muslim grooming gangs.

I am Sandbad, an active member of Council of Ex-Muslims Britain and founder and organizer of Northern Ex-Muslim meet up group. I was born and raised in Iran and lived there until 2002. Since Iran is an Islamic Theocracy I went through the same formal Islamic brainwashing every kid has to go through as a part of the schooling program in the country. This initially made me a devout Muslim but the awareness I gained as a result of this forced familiarization to Islam eventually opened my eyes to see the inconsistencies which were present in Islam so after years of trying to justify religion I finally rejected it all together and am now Atheist.

Righteousness in Islam and BNP

By: Sandbad Ex Muslim

Member of CEMB, Founder and Organizer of Northern Ex-Muslim meet up group

I was reading through Alistair Barbour’s 'anti-nationailst' Weblog here where I came across this leaflet http://www.bnp.org.uk/sites/default/files/ybnp_keepsafe.pdf

Apparently published to warn younger BNP members from falling victim to child groomers!

Being an ex-Muslim this really attracted my attention due to its heavy use of race and appearance (stereotypic Islamic appearance in this case) as a factor to identify child groomers.

Being from Iran and having lived a majority of my life under an Islamic theocracy which follows the same populist approach in its propaganda against the west (heavy use of stereotypic images and indirect brainwashing) and as an atheist and ex-Muslim; seeing this leaflet I found myself stuck between two extremes of which neither I can relate to.

http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Anti-US_Tehran.jpg http://www.flickr.com/photos/herwigphoto/2325197354/

(Examples of Iranian stereotypic images and Propaganda)

I have rejected Islam 'and religion in general' and 'as an atheist' I obviously can’t join the extreme Islamic side of the dispute since non-questioning believe in Islam and its official political perspective is the basic requirement of joining the Islamic league. 

On the other hand I can’t become a white British person neither in order to join the BNP side so looking at this leaflet and being from Islamic “race” but no longer a Muslim I feel as being stuck in no man’s land with bullets flying over my head fired from one side by Islamic extremists and on the other side by BNP.

This leaflet is supposed to be a guideline to keep the youth from falling victim to child groomers but in my perspective it fails to do so for several reasons.

Firstly; its emphasis is mostly on the foreign roots of some child grooming cases that have happened in the recent past here in the UK, rather than the more obvious and universal signs of child grooming. 

It is racially based to a level that if the offending paedophile “to be” will be a person from white British background this leaflet almost entirely fails to provide any hint or protection to a potential victim. So in my view by referring to a few well known cases of Muslim child grooming cases the subject of child grooming is being used as a tool to publish racially motivated propaganda by BNP.

Second; this leaflet has a very simplistic approach to a whole complicated social problem. It depicts a certain group of people as the cause of the problem and totally ignores underlying issues behind it. Just as Nazi regime blamed Jews; Iranian Islamic theocracy blames America and Israel, now BNP is indiscriminately blaming brown and bearded Muslims for being the people who are solely responsible for child grooming in order to build up support around the BNP’s racist agenda.  

As if resolution of this problem is a natural consequence of getting rid of all brown and bearded Muslims.

Going back to the subject of Muslim child grooming gangs, during my schooling years in Iran I was introduced to Islam’s “Islamo-centric” point of view which commonly causes Muslims to accept they are superior to everyone else as a result of being Muslims. To me this introduction happened during what I now call a systematic government sponsored brainwashing as a part of normal schooling program in Iran – I later on rejected these ideas and the superficial feeling of superiority which came with it, but I can imagine these men committed and then justified their outrageous acts of child abuse as a result of a similar “Islamo- centric” mind-set.

I think the false feeling of superiority that they had over their victims on ideological and maybe a lesser extend racial bases made them able to commit these acts and then to justify their behaviour for their own consciences. I think as Muslims they saw themselves as legitimately having the “right” to act the way they did towards their victims and saw their victims as deserving no better treatment. 

So in conclusion with their racist point of view, “them and us” point of view, the Muslim child grooming gangs depicted in BNP’s leaflet saw the white victims of theirs as worthless subjects for their sick sexual fantasies who didn’t deserve any better treatment, and so they justified themselves on racial/ideological grounds for inflicting the suffering and abuse they caused to their victims.

While in retaliation with their racist point of view, “them and us” point of view, the BNP is distracting people attention from the real extent of child grooming/human trafficking/child abuse and the real issues behind it concentrating on few incidents of child grooming committed by Muslims to present a simplistic racist propaganda against brown skinned and bearded Muslims.

So this is more like a clash of two racist/extremist ideas to me. On both sides they are unrealistic, ignorant and have simplistic approach to issues. Both sides are hollow and I don’t expect them to do anything for the good of the mankind.

And I leave the reader with a question. Perhaps the most popular case of child abuse/grooming during last and this year was the one from Jimmy Saville – if his victims had known about this leaflet – and followed it line by line – how could this protect them from a paedophile predator who was going to receive a knighthood later on in his life? 

Or perhaps Saville’s case isn’t too bad from a BNP perspective because Saville was a white British person?

If anyone would like to leave feedback for Sandbad, please leave comment and I will forward on to him.
Likewise' if any one would like to contact/get information on the Northern Ex-Muslims please leave contact details ,as a comment, and I will ensure they are passed on. These will not be published on here.

Nationalists and conspiracies

Can I just add a note before the main post?  Although I much appreciate the dozens of threats and insulting comments I am receiving from far right nutters [ I know I must be annoying quite a few of you] they won’t be published if you cannot make a valid argument without resorting to foul language and threats.

Nationalists have a conspiracy theory for everything. 

Off course they still have the old comfortable one; the Zionists did it! But it’s only when you get deep inside the organisation that the other nut job conspiracies come out.

The largest and most popular by far is the one that the government and the political establishment are all working together to destroy the white Anglo Saxon race. This same establishment hate everything that is British.

Of course, the first obvious flaw in this master plan is this.

Can you imagine how much time and effort the establishment must put in to see this master plan come to fruition?
How much dedication and planning this would take?

Our political elite can’t organise a party in a brewery yet this same group of ineffective and unskilled buffoons are overseeing this master plan to see the white race eliminated!

Then there is ‘The Marxists are behind everything!

Every liberal, teacher, police officer, politician, civil servant, TV presenter, newspaper, journalist etc.

In a nut shell if you’re not a nationalist or if you agree with liberal democracy and humanity you’re a Marxist!

According to the far right, the Marxists even have their own organisation ‘Common purpose’. This was set up to brainwash public sector workers with Marxist ideology.

This way they can control all aspects of British life and oversee a Marxist revolution.To a nationalist it’s a subversive plan to get the whole country ran by Marxists.

You really couldn’t make this stuff up.

There then comes the relatively new one.

Global warming is just a scam ran by the Marxists to gain control over the masses. The fact that the vast majority of experts agree that it is happening is just more proof to nationalists just how embedded the Marxists are.

Global warming is happening and the human race is causing it. But, it doesn’t take much stretch of the imagination to see governments have jumped on an opportunity to raise more taxes and big business to make more profits.

To a nationalist that explanation is just far too simple.

Once you are into conspiracies, there really is no limit. There is 911; the Jews did it. This conspiracy they share with the mad Islamists.  Lady Diana was murdered as was David Kelly. MMR inoculations cause autism. David Koresh and Waco and how the FBI murdered them all because they were nationalists.  

Nationalists will one day all be rounded up and killed [ I think they like this one because it makes them feel brave; like a freedom fighter] 

Every time I stood for election I was warned by so many people “be careful you will just disappear, the establishment hates us because we can see what there game is. Ironic really, because every time I stood I was treat rather decently by these so called Marxist police officers and civil servants!

Our old people are left to starve to death, so immigrants can come in. The fact that thousands off old people are vulnerable every winter is a national disgrace. But too nationalists it can never be just that simple. There has to be a conspiracy behind it.

Then there are the conspiracy theories that are aimed solely at nationalists.

Whichever nationalist party you belong to [and there are more and more by the day] the rival nationalist parties are obviously a covert plan by the Marxists and Zionists to split the nationalist camp.

So ‘for instance’ if you are BNP everyone in the EDL or English Democrat’s is a Marxist or Zionist and vice versa if you are EDL or English Democrats.

If you are not a nationalist you are a Marxist or race traitor.

If you are a nationalist but don’t like Griffin then you even have a conspiracy about him also.
He is state protected and he actually works for the government to hold back nationalism.

I’m not naive enough to believe all that politicians tell me, but sometimes their decisions are down to just plain lunacy and bad management. 

But to nationalists there can never be a simple answer, there has to be a conspiracy and there does appear to be more acceptances of them in nationalist circles.

I’m waiting with anticipation for the theory that the Marxists/ Zionists have kidnapped Bigfoot and Nessie.

Political correctness,human rights and the far right.

For a few years now no one could have escaped the oppressive regime that appears to exist in the UK. The injustices dealt out in the name of political correctness and the human rights act anger many people. Many times made worse and inflated by our overly sensationalist media.

People are furious how things got to this. There appears to be a whole industry of do gooders that has been  built up running, organising and ruining all aspects of British life and all of this fuelled by politicians obsession with building an ‘all-inclusive diverse society.

A cause ‘which at its centre’ is undoubtedly a good thing but the way that it has been done has caused so much resentment amongst and between different communities and sections of British society.

One of the reasons I even attended my first BNP meeting was because of this culture of ‘seemingly’ aggressive and alienating regime of political correctness and the apparent madness carried out because of the human rights act.

When you get angry with the system you become more open to messages coming from fundamentalist and extremist groups like the BNP. 

To them all PC is wrong, the human rights act needs scrapped and all equality laws need thrown out!

I'm lucky I got over my angry stage very quickly realised that their answer was no solution and saw the real agenda of the far right.

Britain was a divided nation. We had racism, inequality and injustices against minorities. We brought in race laws to protect people from bigotry and prejudice; we needed them and still do.

Race laws have greatly reduced the instances of open racism taking place in our country.

Political correctness has undoubtedly helped in reducing the cases of homophobia from what they were years ago.

Equality laws have ensured that women are getting more protection in the workplace and in society.

The human rights act has ensured that every citizen in the UK has basic rights that every human being needs and deserves.

The human rights act in particular is a divided topic. It’s far from perfect but we seem to have this mentality now in Britain; you’re either for it or against it. Keep it or scrap it!

This is crazy and it’s playing into the far rights hands. They dedicate huge parts of their propaganda machine to tell the voter that they are the only parties that will scrap this act.

We don’t have to scrap the human rights act or political correctness.  We just need to make sure they work properly and work for everybody.

Nationalist parties like the BNP use this modern culture to drum up support. They cite it as reasons that society is now unequal and blame most of our ills on these very reasons.

They campaign against race laws that they say are now racist against white people. They blame this very culture for the breakdown of society.

They don’t tell you the real reason that they want the human rights act and all race and equality laws scrapped.

The law has and always will protect people against physical harm. If there were no equality laws you would not be able to physically attack a gay, black or brown person. This is the typical excuse that parties like the BNP give when they are trying to hide what would be the real consequences of their actions and pretending that it would have no adverse effect on society.

BUT, if we had no equality laws no political correctness, things would be very different.

For instance if an African or Asian family moved into an area where the far right were strong and it was no longer illegal to abuse them verbally how long before they were intimidated enough to leave.

If a gay couple were walking down the street and the homophobic abuse that once was all too common was no longer illegal, would being gay be forced ‘through fear’ to go back into the closet and treat as dirty.

In short under a far right government like the BNP this behaviour could become the norm.

One very interesting way they avoid directly answering important questions is on the policy of  voluntary repatriation of anyone who does not fit there Anglo-Saxon heritage.  When asked about this policy, they always say “we would not kick anybody out who was here legally". We would have a voluntary scheme where as people who were not of Anglo Saxon heritage could take a payment of the government to leave”

They then state that these conditions exist at the moment. These payments actually exist now and have done for a few years; which is actually true.

The big difference is that under a far right government it would no longer be illegal to harass anyone of different ethnic origin, make them feel unwelcome or refuse them employment because of the colour of their skin.

How long before many feel like they have no choice but to accept this voluntary repatriation payment. 

The more that take the payment the less that remain [remember there would be absolutely no more immigration] the less that remain the easier it will become to isolate the remaining ones. An ever decreasing circle until they get their wish of a white Britain.

Political correctness, human rights, diversity awareness all belong in modern Britain They belong in any modern civilised country but not in their present form. They need amended and the whole industry around it needs looked at. People are sick of it they are sick of the way the likes of Abu Qatada cannot be deported because of his human rights and the British voter and tax payer has absolutely no say in the matter.

This is giving a totally distorted view of the whole reason for human rights.

We have to be very careful that we don’t throw the baby out with the bathwater.

Britain will be the poorer and more dangerous for it.

It’s not just about terrorists.

One of the main concerns I had when I attended my first BNP meeting was creeping political Islam.
Where I live in the Cumbria we have very few problems associated with fundamentalist Islam. In fact Gordon Brown stated that Cumbria is ‘hideously white’. How insulting to this area, he made it sound like Cumbria is full of racists. No wonder the BNP made such ground up here. Not because we are racists but because new labour made it sound like we should be ashamed because we don’t have as many black/brown immigrants as other places.

Again' labour doing the recruiting for Griffins propaganda machine!

We may not have the same ethnic mix up here but we do have the same media as everyone else and you would have to be blind not to see what is happening in other parts of the country and more worryingly in other parts of the world with political Islam.

For years the news has been dominated by events in Islamic countries and the effects of what happens in the name of Islam. Obviously there are many reasons for injustice, intolerance and violence around the world, but you cannot escape that a disproportionate amount of it is happening in Islamic countries or in the name of Islam. Many on the left use the argument ‘but we have done far worse in our history’. This may be true, but it’s in the past.  Are we supposed to allow arse-holes to behave in such a way because other arse-holes behaved like that in the past?

It’s not just the terrorist acts of 9/11, 7/7. There has always been and sadly there always will be acts of violence perpetrated by ideological cretins. Not just in the name of Islam but also for the backward causes of nationalism, racism and many other prejudices and bigotry's.  When it comes to Islam ‘though’ it’s not the terrorism that worries me and many like me, but more importantly it’s the sexism, homophobia, misogynism and ‘far too often’ violent and sadistic treatment of people in the name of this religion.

Female genital mutilation, forced marriage, so called honour killings [to me one of the worst crimes there is. To kill a loved one because of your own pathetic retarded Stone Age belief system and that this act will somehow restore your honour. This is evil]

Can anybody blame any rational right thinking person for not wanting to import this kind of backward and regressive thinking into our country.

I approached the major parties with my concerns and they all went into overly PC mode.

They all denied there were any problems and that it was imaginary and they all reverted to the usual rhetoric

“Islam is a religion of peace and there is much we can learn from it and the vast majority of Muslims are not interested in fundamentalism and extremism”

At the time I remember thinking “okay show me the evidence”, where are your facts and figures to back up this statement. This statement appears to have become a mantra for the major political parties and many on the left and if you don’t agree with it your racist or Islamophobic!

As I've already said it’s not about the terrorism. As I write this the news is coming in from America about the horrendous killing of children at a school in Connecticut. 

There will always be evil people and as a society we need to push them too, and keep them on the fringes. Take away there power where they can do as little harm as possible.

This obsession with multiculturalism though has seen the importing and tolerance of barbaric practices into this liberal country.

We now have Sharia courts sitting in the UK. A system that has absolutely no bearing or right to be in the modern world. The modern world should be built on man-made rational laws not Stone Age archaic beliefs systems that were made for that time [and not even fit for then]

There is no doubt that nationalist parties are drumming up anti-Islamic feeling for their own backward ideology. They do deserve the mantle of Islamophobic.

But many organisations on the left use this terminology all too freely to attack anyone they see fit.

They seem to be stuck in this mind-set that minority’s need defended no matter what; even if there are some things about that minority that is unacceptable. They brand far too many people who have concerns about Islam as Islamophobic.  

So the left fight for minorities! But’ what about the minority within that minority?

What about the young girls been genitally mutilated?

What about the inherent bigotry that goes with any religion? ‘My religion is the right one therefore I'm more superior to you because you believe in the wrong god’.

What about the minority, made up off young girls been forced into marriage against their wills?

And what about the many women trapped in a societal cage that they would love to break free from if only we had not encouraged and allowed different communities to shut them away from mainstream society so as it has harder for integration to take place.

These organisations seem to be very choosy which minority they fight for!

They should be at the forefront and being vocal about homophobia, sexism and misogynism in any part of society; main stream Islam included. You should defend minorities but not at the expense of basic human rights and common sense!

Hope not Hate published a report on line several months ago [the counter-jihad report] 

In this report they had the obvious and very real racists and bigots such as the BNP but among the major players they also had Baroness Cox;
Why? Because she was campaigning against Sharia law.

This was altered within a few days of going on-line and her name was removed.

They also in their opening statement in this report
http://www.hopenothate.org.uk/counter-jihad/ state that growing Islamophobia in the USA has already resulted in banning Sharia law in several states. They say this is as if it’s a bad thing.

Organisations such as these are no doubt well-meaning and do a hell of a lot of good work

combating the growth of parties such as the BNP but they appear to have this mind-set that that if you speak of the same problems that the BNP speak of you must be an Islamophobic bigot as well.

This Islamophobic term is doing so much harm. Yes the BNP and many of the other nationalist movements are undoubtedly Islamophobic, but most people who speak out are just rational citizens.

In my time in the BNP I stood for election a few times. Knocked on hundreds if not thousands of doors and spoke to just as many in the streets. Very rarely did I hear a racist comment. Very rarely did I hear anyone say that they wanted to stop immigration or kick people out. Most people where concerned with 'MASS' immigration and communities integrating.

But it has to be said that when people did express any worries about any immigrant community it was always the same, Islam and Muslims!

For far too many people the whole issue of immigration and any negative aspects of it has become synonymous with the Islamic community.

Immigration is again being debated, this time by the Labour party. The same party that allowed unlimited mass immigration and is responsible for making it such a divisive issue. As usual they are making it sound like all problems would disappear if everyone spoke the same language.

Do they really think it’s that easy? 

Do they really think that all the problems are coming over with new immigrants and it’s because they don’t speak English?

Most of the terrorists have been born in the west. Fools like Anjem Choudary and most of his band of inadequate men were born here and speak perfect English. But it’s these idiots who are pushing for Sharia law.

Of course everyone who lives in the same country should be able to communicate with each other, but it’s this infatuation with multiculturalism that is causing division.
Britain is a modern and diverse society. The 2011 census states that we are the most diverse society in Europe. That we have the highest percentage of mixed race children. This is all excellent news for Britain and makes it the modern country that it is [It’s only the nationalists who want to see Britain full of white people. Most people just want to see Britain full of decent people] but we have to be able to criticise the elements that we don’t want here and we need to fight vigorously for EVERY person and stuff ethnic or cultural sensitivity’s.

Nationalists and the BBC

For the last few months one story has been dominating the headlines; Jimmy Savile.

It turns out that this freak has been abusing kids for years, and getting away with it [it amazes me how anyone who looks that weird could have even be allowed near kids in the first place but that’s another issue]

No doubt the investigation will run for a long time yet and it will be a while before we hear exactly what he and his sick friends were up to.

For months the BNP has been trying to make political capital on the back of the grooming gangs that I mentioned in a previous post.

http://alistairbarbour.blogspot.co.uk/2012/11/propaganda-instead-of-policys.html

They went to great lengths to draw attention to the fact that the grooming gangs in question were Muslim and that this perverted crime is only perpetrated by Muslims.

They tried their best to cast distrust between communities and to stigmatise Muslims in particular.

So what’s the nationalist take on the Savile story?

Well they certainly aren't focusing on the perverts colour this time. Nor are they concentrating on his ethnicity, religion or cultural background.

They can’t focus on his colour; he is white. They can’t focus on his origins, he is British or his religion [Roman Catholic]. Chances are most of his co-accused are also white.

Not much a nationalist can use there?

They have spent months trying to vilify the whole Asian community because of the actions of some perverted excuses for men.

They targeted these because they were not white British. So now we have a case involving white Anglo Saxon perverts. The BNP can’t target that community! Luckily for them though Savile worked for the BBC so they attack that instead.

Political parties like the BNP hate the BBC. Well to be accurate they hate the media but the BBC in particular. They really do believe the BBC is an organisation dedicated to destroying everything that is British /English.

Everyone knows that the BBC is left leaning but to Nationalist parties they have invented something much much darker. They believe the BBC is run by Marxists, communists and traitors. With one aim, to destroy Britain/England!

They dedicate masses of their propaganda machine against the media and particularly the BBC. To them everything the BBC does is a cold calculating plan to brainwash the populace. To these fools a socially aware programme about the third world or injustices in a foreign land becomes a concerted effort to manipulate the people [or sheeple as they like to call the great British public] into being more open to liberalism and globalisation.

Nationalists can see a conspiracy in an empty room where only they are present!

In typical nationalist style though parties like the BNP are not only paranoid but they are also thick.

If they are convinced that media has it in for them surely they would go on a charm offensive to show them their supposed true side [well put on a charade].

I was present at the BNPs Euro election launch in Manchester. The place was packed with reporters from many of the main media outlets; the BBC being one of them.

Firstly Griffin gets up on the stage and insults the media, reserving his most paranoid vitriol for the BBC. He proceeds to tell them that they are Marxists and traitors and are betraying Britain with their Liberal views. All of this verbal vomit is lapped up by many in the audience. Calls of scum and such like are called out; all directed at the BBC crew present. I was sitting beside them and could see quite plainly the looks of astonishment on their faces.

So why does griffin taunt the media so much?

Surely an intelligent man would go on a charm offensive and try to get good press.

This ‘however’ is not the way that Griffin operates. He knows fine well that the likes of the BNP will never get into power the democratic way. Yes they may get lots of people who are worried about some of the same things that they campaign on but the British people aren't interested in nationalism.

He knows that the BNP will never get enough votes and thus enough people elected.

In this instance like many others he was baiting the press not for the outside world but for the people in that room.

His whole motive is to keep playing the victim card and hope that the other parties keep screwing up [and sadly they do]. He longs to build a street army of loyal activists and thugs. This is one of the reasons he hates the EDL leadership. He would love to have that many street soldiers as the EDL had at its height.

Griffin is desperately trying to get these EDL supporters to swap allegiance to the BNP instead. 

He really believes that one day these race riots ‘he so longs for’ will happen then he and his army of semi intelligent paranoid thugs can take to the streets and drum up real support. This is his real objective.

Not to get voted into power but to sweep in on the back of major social unrest. To get enough support that he can become a power broker.

Nationalists who are against Griffins leadership believe he is running the party down because he is working for the state! Pro or anti Griffin, there's a conspiracy to cover all angles!

Nothing is as it seems to a nationalist, everything has a conspiracy attached!

Griffin’s term as an MEP is up in 2014. He then has to campaign be re-elected.

Already his victim machine is in overdrive. He has organised demo's outside mosques, council chambers, the BBC and anywhere else he thinks these bogey men Marxists hang out.

When the election is due and he gets his free mail shot to every voter in the North West he can then show them how he and he alone has been fighting to defend them against this legion of traitors [in his head]. 

At the moment he doesn't stand a hope in hell of being re-elected, but if the main party’s don’t deal with ordinary people’s real concerns the tide could again turn in his favour.

Nationalism and culture.

Most people gravitate towards nationalism because they have genuine concerns and believe the main parties aren't speaking for them. Its only when they get plugged into the propaganda machine that they are either sucked further in or blown out.

Most [like me] get blown out.

The ones who are sucked in end up in a [what is for all intense purposes] a cult!

It ends up all being about race and ethnicity.

They think there is a ‘concerted effort to eradicate the Anglo Saxon race and its culture’

They end up with an ever decreasing circle of friends and the world closes in on them. Leaders like Griffin end up with the same reverence as religious cult leaders like David Koresh and Jimmy Jones. Their world view becomes distorted and they see conspiracies everywhere.

This ethnicity/race argument falls on stony ground with so many people that nationalist parties are reinventing themselves. 

They now focus on culture instead.

They now no longer mention the colour of your skin or your ethnic origin, but the colour and style of your clothes. The music you listen too. The deity’s you worship and the language you speak.

These cultural nationalists say “it’s all about culture” but it’s just the same ideology re-branded to sell to the British voter.

Parties  like the English Democrats, Britain first, British freedom and several others [they seem to be springing up on a monthly basis] now say we don’t care about the colour of your skin as long as you embrace being British or English.

What exactly does this mean though? What is British/English culture?  

I think the most idiotic remark I've heard recently was by Eddy Butler [ex BNP now English Democrats]

He had been in Edinburgh for a few days and stated [on his blog] that there are glaring differences between cultures. He then goes onto say that you can tell the difference between an Englishman and a Scot just by the way they carry themselves??

Well if nationalists can see a difference between a Scot and an Englishman’ just by looking at them’ what the hell differences do they see when looking at an African or an Asian?

Again ‘it’s hard to argue with this kind of mentality. They will argue that ‘just because you can’t see it that you've been brainwashed by the politically correct media’ or some other such crap.

A definition of culture is …the characteristics of a particular group of people, defined by everything from language, religion, cuisine, social habits, music and arts.

Cuisine, music and the arts; this kind of positive multiculturalism has made Britain the vibrant and cosmopolitan country that it is today. Of course if you want to you will find an instance to bring that statement crumbling down, nationalists always do!

At a meeting in the North East one senior BNP man was doing a speech and moaned on for 20 minutes about how his girlfriend had dragged him to a local cultural event and some Indians had sold him a curry for five pounds and it was “small and horrible”.

This was [to him] how these “bloody foreigners are ripping us all off’.

It really doesn't take much for some people!

When faced with this kind of unwarranted bigotry you just roll your eyes and switch off and think once again "I've entered the twilight zone"

And then there was the ex BNP GLA member Richard Barnbrook who spent an inordinate amount of time trying to get such things as the Notting hill carnival stopped.

To your die hard nationalist these kinds of events are undermining British culture and identity!

Language; this is another favourite of Nationalists.

Yes there are problems with language. One example nationalists cite; are the vast amounts of money being spent on translation services, all funded by the taxpayer. They have a point.

The main issue ‘however’ should be if everyone speaks different languages how can a society work well?

The system is far from perfect but the nationalist way is not the answer.

Social habits and religion; now we come down to the reason me and many others have listened to the nationalist message.

All too often it is religion that has the greatest impact on social habits. It’s not so much the religion that causes social barriers but the social habits that the religion forms. Some good some bad, some downright barbaric and inhuman!       

Religion and the way it forms negative social habits is the one fly in the ointment. 

It is these bad points that the far right use to try and turn everyone off any aspect of multiculturalism.

I'm like many people and am not against the positive elements of multiculturalism, just the negative ones that divide us.

On the other side of the political spectrum and aiding them we have the post-modern left and there obsession with multiculturalism.

To them multiculturalism in its entirety is and always will be a good thing, and you must be a racist if you disagree.

This kind of arrogant thinking is causing more problems in British society than nationalism.

Nationalism is small time; a small handful of nutjob’s trying to stir things up.

The post-modern multicultural apologists are a huge movement though who have real influence and power on all aspects of our lives. They are the recruiting agents for the nationalists.

Under there screwed up version of a multicultural utopia; it’s great that everyone speaks different languages, live in there own communities and where stone age practices are accepted and tolerated because "we can’t criticise another culture".

"Yes we bloody can and what’s more; any moral modern human should"

The lefts obsession with multiculturalism has seen Britain become more and more segregated. People have divided along cultural lines and shut themselves off from their neighbours and all with the blessing of the left. This is not good for society.

The far right tell us everything but British/English culture is great and should be preserved. The far left tell us that we should respect and tolerate everything about another person’s culture.

It’s not about culture though. It’s about modernism. 

Its not about nationality it’s about rationality. It’s about encouraging the spread and growth of the modern world, not the encouragement and growth of the illiberal and inhumane backward world.

Religion and its associated social habits is the one thing that divides us.

We constantly hear from the right how Britain is a Christian country and should remain so.

This country was not built solely on Christianity. This country became modern by looking past Christianity and allowing society to develop without the constraint’s put on by it by religion.

In the process Christianity in the UK had to evolve. This is why the Anglican Church is liberal, it had to become so to survive.

The multicultural left want all religions to be equal in Britain. This means any religion no matter how backward it may be in some of its views should have an equal say in our society.

This is dangerous. Christianity went through an enlightenment [and I am not sticking up for Christianity  the sooner religion is assigned to history the better]. To a certain extent it came out of the dark ages.

Some other religions have yet to do this. Islam for one need’s to modernise to fit in with many aspects of the modern world!

So what is British/English culture, what is it that makes us stand out in the modern world?

I will get so much stick for this for but I don’t think we have one! 

We have a modern culture. A homogeneous culture that we share with many modern countries. Yes we have many cultural idiosyncrasies and sub cultures but it’s this modern culture we should be proud off. 

No doubt nationalists will be able to give me a long list of what it means to be British/English, but most of them will be from the past.

So the far right are trying to preserve something that doesn't exist. The far left are trying to force us to accept thought processes and practices that people in a modern world find appalling.

As a society we shouldn't be concentrating on multiculturalism and differences. We don’t have to be obsessed with monoculture either. We should be looking at what we have in common and our shared values.

British nationalists-born again Christians?

These last few months I've watched as parties such as the BNP appear to be getting more religious. I say “appear” because it’s all just another propaganda con trick!

The BNP is not a Christian organisation. Many of the high ranking officials want God and Jesus replaced with Odin and Thor and the fairy story of heaven replaced with the equally ludicrous Valhalla.

You just have to look at some pictures of their antiquated get together’s to see overgrown children like Chris Beverly [ex BNP and current English democrat’s] running around with swords pretending to be ‘warriors’!!!

They despise Christianity because it originates from that place where all those brown skinned people live! That is not just a humorous dig this is what these fools believe.

One of the many weird things about party’s like the BNP is that we all know they want to turn the clock back, but I don’t think people know just how far.

Some of these nuts want paganism to be the national religion again.

Roll on stone circles been built on every village green and maypole dancing being the national sport ‘and god help us’ Morris dancing being on the curriculum at school!

What next religious slaughter of animals?

That sounds familiar, yet another cause that the nationalist parties have attempted to hijack [more on that another time]

Christianity is just another cause they have latched onto. One more with which to wring their hands and shout that 'the system is out to get them'. In typical nationalistic style [a style of paranoia and perceived unfairness] whereas every government organisation is out to get you and everything that is British/English.

Recently the BNP have even started a Sunday sermon on their website .This is just a cynical ploy to attract another demographic of voter.  It’s all the usual fire and brimstone, but laced with s heavy subterfuge that christianity is under threat.

For a few years now there has been this ridiculous misconception that the Christian faith is under attack. You hear on a regular basis how Christians are losing their rights.

Christianity is not under attack. It is becoming un-necessary!

It’s a pity that we are not treating all religions the same.  Unfortunately overly political correctness is ensuring that some other religions such as Islam are not also being consigned to history.

This is leaving the ground open to the childish nationalist’s party to stamp there feet and scream unfair.

Another reason they are becoming more vocal in the defence of Christianity is because ‘on average’ nationalist party members are increasingly coming from the older generation. This can be seen all too easily by looking at any of their propaganda photos. Whenever there is a meeting or street activity it’s all too obvious that they are attracting more of the elderly.

Why, are older folk racist?  No not at all. It may just be that many of the older generation are more susceptible to their message.  This message that everything has changed for the worse and Britain is a hellish land of immigrants and that their own government is out to destroy everything that is British and in this case Christianity.

This perceived attack on Christianity is just another tool in the nationalist party’s tool box to garner support.

After all the elderly now make up one of the largest demographic of voters in the UK!

If the BNP can fool them into believing that there Christian heritage is under attack they may just gain massive support.

In their clamour to get more votes they will defend anything that they believe will get them support.  

Victim status is the only message for nationalists. Once you cut through this they have nothing of substance to offer.