It’s not just about terrorists.

One of the main concerns I had when I attended my first BNP meeting was creeping political Islam.
Where I live in the Cumbria we have very few problems associated with fundamentalist Islam. In fact Gordon Brown stated that Cumbria is ‘hideously white’. How insulting to this area, he made it sound like Cumbria is full of racists. No wonder the BNP made such ground up here. Not because we are racists but because new labour made it sound like we should be ashamed because we don’t have as many black/brown immigrants as other places.

Again' labour doing the recruiting for Griffins propaganda machine!

We may not have the same ethnic mix up here but we do have the same media as everyone else and you would have to be blind not to see what is happening in other parts of the country and more worryingly in other parts of the world with political Islam.

For years the news has been dominated by events in Islamic countries and the effects of what happens in the name of Islam. Obviously there are many reasons for injustice, intolerance and violence around the world, but you cannot escape that a disproportionate amount of it is happening in Islamic countries or in the name of Islam. Many on the left use the argument ‘but we have done far worse in our history’. This may be true, but it’s in the past.  Are we supposed to allow arse-holes to behave in such a way because other arse-holes behaved like that in the past?

It’s not just the terrorist acts of 9/11, 7/7. There has always been and sadly there always will be acts of violence perpetrated by ideological cretins. Not just in the name of Islam but also for the backward causes of nationalism, racism and many other prejudices and bigotry's.  When it comes to Islam ‘though’ it’s not the terrorism that worries me and many like me, but more importantly it’s the sexism, homophobia, misogynism and ‘far too often’ violent and sadistic treatment of people in the name of this religion.

Female genital mutilation, forced marriage, so called honour killings [to me one of the worst crimes there is. To kill a loved one because of your own pathetic retarded Stone Age belief system and that this act will somehow restore your honour. This is evil]

Can anybody blame any rational right thinking person for not wanting to import this kind of backward and regressive thinking into our country.

I approached the major parties with my concerns and they all went into overly PC mode.

They all denied there were any problems and that it was imaginary and they all reverted to the usual rhetoric

“Islam is a religion of peace and there is much we can learn from it and the vast majority of Muslims are not interested in fundamentalism and extremism”

At the time I remember thinking “okay show me the evidence”, where are your facts and figures to back up this statement. This statement appears to have become a mantra for the major political parties and many on the left and if you don’t agree with it your racist or Islamophobic!

As I've already said it’s not about the terrorism. As I write this the news is coming in from America about the horrendous killing of children at a school in Connecticut. 

There will always be evil people and as a society we need to push them too, and keep them on the fringes. Take away there power where they can do as little harm as possible.

This obsession with multiculturalism though has seen the importing and tolerance of barbaric practices into this liberal country.

We now have Sharia courts sitting in the UK. A system that has absolutely no bearing or right to be in the modern world. The modern world should be built on man-made rational laws not Stone Age archaic beliefs systems that were made for that time [and not even fit for then]

There is no doubt that nationalist parties are drumming up anti-Islamic feeling for their own backward ideology. They do deserve the mantle of Islamophobic.

But many organisations on the left use this terminology all too freely to attack anyone they see fit.

They seem to be stuck in this mind-set that minority’s need defended no matter what; even if there are some things about that minority that is unacceptable. They brand far too many people who have concerns about Islam as Islamophobic.  

So the left fight for minorities! But’ what about the minority within that minority?

What about the young girls been genitally mutilated?

What about the inherent bigotry that goes with any religion? ‘My religion is the right one therefore I'm more superior to you because you believe in the wrong god’.

What about the minority, made up off young girls been forced into marriage against their wills?

And what about the many women trapped in a societal cage that they would love to break free from if only we had not encouraged and allowed different communities to shut them away from mainstream society so as it has harder for integration to take place.

These organisations seem to be very choosy which minority they fight for!

They should be at the forefront and being vocal about homophobia, sexism and misogynism in any part of society; main stream Islam included. You should defend minorities but not at the expense of basic human rights and common sense!

Hope not Hate published a report on line several months ago [the counter-jihad report] 

In this report they had the obvious and very real racists and bigots such as the BNP but among the major players they also had Baroness Cox;
Why? Because she was campaigning against Sharia law.

This was altered within a few days of going on-line and her name was removed.

They also in their opening statement in this report
http://www.hopenothate.org.uk/counter-jihad/ state that growing Islamophobia in the USA has already resulted in banning Sharia law in several states. They say this is as if it’s a bad thing.

Organisations such as these are no doubt well-meaning and do a hell of a lot of good work

combating the growth of parties such as the BNP but they appear to have this mind-set that that if you speak of the same problems that the BNP speak of you must be an Islamophobic bigot as well.

This Islamophobic term is doing so much harm. Yes the BNP and many of the other nationalist movements are undoubtedly Islamophobic, but most people who speak out are just rational citizens.

In my time in the BNP I stood for election a few times. Knocked on hundreds if not thousands of doors and spoke to just as many in the streets. Very rarely did I hear a racist comment. Very rarely did I hear anyone say that they wanted to stop immigration or kick people out. Most people where concerned with 'MASS' immigration and communities integrating.

But it has to be said that when people did express any worries about any immigrant community it was always the same, Islam and Muslims!

For far too many people the whole issue of immigration and any negative aspects of it has become synonymous with the Islamic community.

Immigration is again being debated, this time by the Labour party. The same party that allowed unlimited mass immigration and is responsible for making it such a divisive issue. As usual they are making it sound like all problems would disappear if everyone spoke the same language.

Do they really think it’s that easy? 

Do they really think that all the problems are coming over with new immigrants and it’s because they don’t speak English?

Most of the terrorists have been born in the west. Fools like Anjem Choudary and most of his band of inadequate men were born here and speak perfect English. But it’s these idiots who are pushing for Sharia law.

Of course everyone who lives in the same country should be able to communicate with each other, but it’s this infatuation with multiculturalism that is causing division.
Britain is a modern and diverse society. The 2011 census states that we are the most diverse society in Europe. That we have the highest percentage of mixed race children. This is all excellent news for Britain and makes it the modern country that it is [It’s only the nationalists who want to see Britain full of white people. Most people just want to see Britain full of decent people] but we have to be able to criticise the elements that we don’t want here and we need to fight vigorously for EVERY person and stuff ethnic or cultural sensitivity’s.

Nationalists and the BBC

For the last few months one story has been dominating the headlines; Jimmy Savile.

It turns out that this freak has been abusing kids for years, and getting away with it [it amazes me how anyone who looks that weird could have even be allowed near kids in the first place but that’s another issue]

No doubt the investigation will run for a long time yet and it will be a while before we hear exactly what he and his sick friends were up to.

For months the BNP has been trying to make political capital on the back of the grooming gangs that I mentioned in a previous post.

http://alistairbarbour.blogspot.co.uk/2012/11/propaganda-instead-of-policys.html

They went to great lengths to draw attention to the fact that the grooming gangs in question were Muslim and that this perverted crime is only perpetrated by Muslims.

They tried their best to cast distrust between communities and to stigmatise Muslims in particular.

So what’s the nationalist take on the Savile story?

Well they certainly aren't focusing on the perverts colour this time. Nor are they concentrating on his ethnicity, religion or cultural background.

They can’t focus on his colour; he is white. They can’t focus on his origins, he is British or his religion [Roman Catholic]. Chances are most of his co-accused are also white.

Not much a nationalist can use there?

They have spent months trying to vilify the whole Asian community because of the actions of some perverted excuses for men.

They targeted these because they were not white British. So now we have a case involving white Anglo Saxon perverts. The BNP can’t target that community! Luckily for them though Savile worked for the BBC so they attack that instead.

Political parties like the BNP hate the BBC. Well to be accurate they hate the media but the BBC in particular. They really do believe the BBC is an organisation dedicated to destroying everything that is British /English.

Everyone knows that the BBC is left leaning but to Nationalist parties they have invented something much much darker. They believe the BBC is run by Marxists, communists and traitors. With one aim, to destroy Britain/England!

They dedicate masses of their propaganda machine against the media and particularly the BBC. To them everything the BBC does is a cold calculating plan to brainwash the populace. To these fools a socially aware programme about the third world or injustices in a foreign land becomes a concerted effort to manipulate the people [or sheeple as they like to call the great British public] into being more open to liberalism and globalisation.

Nationalists can see a conspiracy in an empty room where only they are present!

In typical nationalist style though parties like the BNP are not only paranoid but they are also thick.

If they are convinced that media has it in for them surely they would go on a charm offensive to show them their supposed true side [well put on a charade].

I was present at the BNPs Euro election launch in Manchester. The place was packed with reporters from many of the main media outlets; the BBC being one of them.

Firstly Griffin gets up on the stage and insults the media, reserving his most paranoid vitriol for the BBC. He proceeds to tell them that they are Marxists and traitors and are betraying Britain with their Liberal views. All of this verbal vomit is lapped up by many in the audience. Calls of scum and such like are called out; all directed at the BBC crew present. I was sitting beside them and could see quite plainly the looks of astonishment on their faces.

So why does griffin taunt the media so much?

Surely an intelligent man would go on a charm offensive and try to get good press.

This ‘however’ is not the way that Griffin operates. He knows fine well that the likes of the BNP will never get into power the democratic way. Yes they may get lots of people who are worried about some of the same things that they campaign on but the British people aren't interested in nationalism.

He knows that the BNP will never get enough votes and thus enough people elected.

In this instance like many others he was baiting the press not for the outside world but for the people in that room.

His whole motive is to keep playing the victim card and hope that the other parties keep screwing up [and sadly they do]. He longs to build a street army of loyal activists and thugs. This is one of the reasons he hates the EDL leadership. He would love to have that many street soldiers as the EDL had at its height.

Griffin is desperately trying to get these EDL supporters to swap allegiance to the BNP instead. 

He really believes that one day these race riots ‘he so longs for’ will happen then he and his army of semi intelligent paranoid thugs can take to the streets and drum up real support. This is his real objective.

Not to get voted into power but to sweep in on the back of major social unrest. To get enough support that he can become a power broker.

Nationalists who are against Griffins leadership believe he is running the party down because he is working for the state! Pro or anti Griffin, there's a conspiracy to cover all angles!

Nothing is as it seems to a nationalist, everything has a conspiracy attached!

Griffin’s term as an MEP is up in 2014. He then has to campaign be re-elected.

Already his victim machine is in overdrive. He has organised demo's outside mosques, council chambers, the BBC and anywhere else he thinks these bogey men Marxists hang out.

When the election is due and he gets his free mail shot to every voter in the North West he can then show them how he and he alone has been fighting to defend them against this legion of traitors [in his head]. 

At the moment he doesn't stand a hope in hell of being re-elected, but if the main party’s don’t deal with ordinary people’s real concerns the tide could again turn in his favour.

Nationalism and culture.

Most people gravitate towards nationalism because they have genuine concerns and believe the main parties aren't speaking for them. Its only when they get plugged into the propaganda machine that they are either sucked further in or blown out.

Most [like me] get blown out.

The ones who are sucked in end up in a [what is for all intense purposes] a cult!

It ends up all being about race and ethnicity.

They think there is a ‘concerted effort to eradicate the Anglo Saxon race and its culture’

They end up with an ever decreasing circle of friends and the world closes in on them. Leaders like Griffin end up with the same reverence as religious cult leaders like David Koresh and Jimmy Jones. Their world view becomes distorted and they see conspiracies everywhere.

This ethnicity/race argument falls on stony ground with so many people that nationalist parties are reinventing themselves. 

They now focus on culture instead.

They now no longer mention the colour of your skin or your ethnic origin, but the colour and style of your clothes. The music you listen too. The deity’s you worship and the language you speak.

These cultural nationalists say “it’s all about culture” but it’s just the same ideology re-branded to sell to the British voter.

Parties  like the English Democrats, Britain first, British freedom and several others [they seem to be springing up on a monthly basis] now say we don’t care about the colour of your skin as long as you embrace being British or English.

What exactly does this mean though? What is British/English culture?  

I think the most idiotic remark I've heard recently was by Eddy Butler [ex BNP now English Democrats]

He had been in Edinburgh for a few days and stated [on his blog] that there are glaring differences between cultures. He then goes onto say that you can tell the difference between an Englishman and a Scot just by the way they carry themselves??

Well if nationalists can see a difference between a Scot and an Englishman’ just by looking at them’ what the hell differences do they see when looking at an African or an Asian?

Again ‘it’s hard to argue with this kind of mentality. They will argue that ‘just because you can’t see it that you've been brainwashed by the politically correct media’ or some other such crap.

A definition of culture is …the characteristics of a particular group of people, defined by everything from language, religion, cuisine, social habits, music and arts.

Cuisine, music and the arts; this kind of positive multiculturalism has made Britain the vibrant and cosmopolitan country that it is today. Of course if you want to you will find an instance to bring that statement crumbling down, nationalists always do!

At a meeting in the North East one senior BNP man was doing a speech and moaned on for 20 minutes about how his girlfriend had dragged him to a local cultural event and some Indians had sold him a curry for five pounds and it was “small and horrible”.

This was [to him] how these “bloody foreigners are ripping us all off’.

It really doesn't take much for some people!

When faced with this kind of unwarranted bigotry you just roll your eyes and switch off and think once again "I've entered the twilight zone"

And then there was the ex BNP GLA member Richard Barnbrook who spent an inordinate amount of time trying to get such things as the Notting hill carnival stopped.

To your die hard nationalist these kinds of events are undermining British culture and identity!

Language; this is another favourite of Nationalists.

Yes there are problems with language. One example nationalists cite; are the vast amounts of money being spent on translation services, all funded by the taxpayer. They have a point.

The main issue ‘however’ should be if everyone speaks different languages how can a society work well?

The system is far from perfect but the nationalist way is not the answer.

Social habits and religion; now we come down to the reason me and many others have listened to the nationalist message.

All too often it is religion that has the greatest impact on social habits. It’s not so much the religion that causes social barriers but the social habits that the religion forms. Some good some bad, some downright barbaric and inhuman!       

Religion and the way it forms negative social habits is the one fly in the ointment. 

It is these bad points that the far right use to try and turn everyone off any aspect of multiculturalism.

I'm like many people and am not against the positive elements of multiculturalism, just the negative ones that divide us.

On the other side of the political spectrum and aiding them we have the post-modern left and there obsession with multiculturalism.

To them multiculturalism in its entirety is and always will be a good thing, and you must be a racist if you disagree.

This kind of arrogant thinking is causing more problems in British society than nationalism.

Nationalism is small time; a small handful of nutjob’s trying to stir things up.

The post-modern multicultural apologists are a huge movement though who have real influence and power on all aspects of our lives. They are the recruiting agents for the nationalists.

Under there screwed up version of a multicultural utopia; it’s great that everyone speaks different languages, live in there own communities and where stone age practices are accepted and tolerated because "we can’t criticise another culture".

"Yes we bloody can and what’s more; any moral modern human should"

The lefts obsession with multiculturalism has seen Britain become more and more segregated. People have divided along cultural lines and shut themselves off from their neighbours and all with the blessing of the left. This is not good for society.

The far right tell us everything but British/English culture is great and should be preserved. The far left tell us that we should respect and tolerate everything about another person’s culture.

It’s not about culture though. It’s about modernism. 

Its not about nationality it’s about rationality. It’s about encouraging the spread and growth of the modern world, not the encouragement and growth of the illiberal and inhumane backward world.

Religion and its associated social habits is the one thing that divides us.

We constantly hear from the right how Britain is a Christian country and should remain so.

This country was not built solely on Christianity. This country became modern by looking past Christianity and allowing society to develop without the constraint’s put on by it by religion.

In the process Christianity in the UK had to evolve. This is why the Anglican Church is liberal, it had to become so to survive.

The multicultural left want all religions to be equal in Britain. This means any religion no matter how backward it may be in some of its views should have an equal say in our society.

This is dangerous. Christianity went through an enlightenment [and I am not sticking up for Christianity  the sooner religion is assigned to history the better]. To a certain extent it came out of the dark ages.

Some other religions have yet to do this. Islam for one need’s to modernise to fit in with many aspects of the modern world!

So what is British/English culture, what is it that makes us stand out in the modern world?

I will get so much stick for this for but I don’t think we have one! 

We have a modern culture. A homogeneous culture that we share with many modern countries. Yes we have many cultural idiosyncrasies and sub cultures but it’s this modern culture we should be proud off. 

No doubt nationalists will be able to give me a long list of what it means to be British/English, but most of them will be from the past.

So the far right are trying to preserve something that doesn't exist. The far left are trying to force us to accept thought processes and practices that people in a modern world find appalling.

As a society we shouldn't be concentrating on multiculturalism and differences. We don’t have to be obsessed with monoculture either. We should be looking at what we have in common and our shared values.

British nationalists-born again Christians?

These last few months I've watched as parties such as the BNP appear to be getting more religious. I say “appear” because it’s all just another propaganda con trick!

The BNP is not a Christian organisation. Many of the high ranking officials want God and Jesus replaced with Odin and Thor and the fairy story of heaven replaced with the equally ludicrous Valhalla.

You just have to look at some pictures of their antiquated get together’s to see overgrown children like Chris Beverly [ex BNP and current English democrat’s] running around with swords pretending to be ‘warriors’!!!

They despise Christianity because it originates from that place where all those brown skinned people live! That is not just a humorous dig this is what these fools believe.

One of the many weird things about party’s like the BNP is that we all know they want to turn the clock back, but I don’t think people know just how far.

Some of these nuts want paganism to be the national religion again.

Roll on stone circles been built on every village green and maypole dancing being the national sport ‘and god help us’ Morris dancing being on the curriculum at school!

What next religious slaughter of animals?

That sounds familiar, yet another cause that the nationalist parties have attempted to hijack [more on that another time]

Christianity is just another cause they have latched onto. One more with which to wring their hands and shout that 'the system is out to get them'. In typical nationalistic style [a style of paranoia and perceived unfairness] whereas every government organisation is out to get you and everything that is British/English.

Recently the BNP have even started a Sunday sermon on their website .This is just a cynical ploy to attract another demographic of voter.  It’s all the usual fire and brimstone, but laced with s heavy subterfuge that christianity is under threat.

For a few years now there has been this ridiculous misconception that the Christian faith is under attack. You hear on a regular basis how Christians are losing their rights.

Christianity is not under attack. It is becoming un-necessary!

It’s a pity that we are not treating all religions the same.  Unfortunately overly political correctness is ensuring that some other religions such as Islam are not also being consigned to history.

This is leaving the ground open to the childish nationalist’s party to stamp there feet and scream unfair.

Another reason they are becoming more vocal in the defence of Christianity is because ‘on average’ nationalist party members are increasingly coming from the older generation. This can be seen all too easily by looking at any of their propaganda photos. Whenever there is a meeting or street activity it’s all too obvious that they are attracting more of the elderly.

Why, are older folk racist?  No not at all. It may just be that many of the older generation are more susceptible to their message.  This message that everything has changed for the worse and Britain is a hellish land of immigrants and that their own government is out to destroy everything that is British and in this case Christianity.

This perceived attack on Christianity is just another tool in the nationalist party’s tool box to garner support.

After all the elderly now make up one of the largest demographic of voters in the UK!

If the BNP can fool them into believing that there Christian heritage is under attack they may just gain massive support.

In their clamour to get more votes they will defend anything that they believe will get them support.  

Victim status is the only message for nationalists. Once you cut through this they have nothing of substance to offer.

Propaganda instead of policy’s

I appear to be back on the BNP mailing list.

When I left the BNP I received numerous anonymous threats and intimidation. Some were made by phone, some by email, so I changed both. I still check my old email address every so often just to see if there are any nationalist loons still sending anything.

I checked it today and was surprised to see one of their official propaganda emails.

At the moment the party is haemorrhaging support and have perhaps in desperation dug out some old mailing lists, my details being on it.

With this email there was an attachment for a leaflet which they will be distributing nationwide.

http://www.bnp.org.uk/sites/default/files/ybnp_keepsafe.pdf

This leaflet is all about keeping our children safe from predatory sex criminals.

A very important cause!

But in usual BNP style it is just a convenient excuse to target a minority. It refers to the grooming gangs that have been all over the news these past few months.

But only the grooming gangs that are Muslim!

Let me be very clear on this.These Muslim men along with any child sex offender should be locked up and the key thrown away. I ‘like any decent human being’ detest sex criminals particularly sex crimes involving children.

The leaflet starts with a list of key points on how to spot a groomer.

One of these points specifically asks ‘does he hail from a Muslim country’?

“No doubting who this leaflet is targeting then”

This follows onto a short piece on how the establishment tried to lock Nick Griffin up when he raised this subject several years ago.

The BNP are having field day with this. Griffin said this was happening years ago and he was ignored and put on trial.

This should have been investigated then, just because a backwards racist like Griffin says it is happening does not mean you can ignore it.

Other people like Labour MP Ann Crier from Keighley and Mohammed Shafiq from the Ramadan foundation also said that this was happening’ they too were ignored.

One aspect that has come to light in relation to these Muslim grooming gangs is that it has become very clear that many people who could have prevented these crimes turned a blind eye to this obscene behavior because of ethnic sensitivities and the fear of having the race card used against them.

There should be a full investigation and these people made to pay for their actions.

Next there is a photo of twenty five convicted pedophiles. 

All Brown skinned [maybe one white but it is hard to tell as he is wearing a cap, perhaps he been placed there just to try and avert criticism]

Underneath these pictures in bold print is the statement “These are groomers, this is what they look like”

With these pictures there is more advice for young girls.

“If you’re a Sikh he may pretend to be one too, even wearing a bangle and using a Sikh name”.

The BNP have been trying for a while to garner Sikh support. Not because they like and want Sikhs in the UK, but because they are trying to divide community’s.

Isolate the Muslims first then eventually they will get to the Sikhs, then Afro Caribbean, African, eastern Europeans etc.

There then follows a personal account by a young girl who was groomed by these perverts.  

Sadly there are far too many young girls who will have similar story's to tell.

Finally the leaflet finishes with a drawing of a young girl in distress, beside her a bottle of poison and just too make sure that the reader has no doubt where all groomers hail from there is the red crescent of Islam with a hypodermic needle through it.

Then just in case the you have missed the point of what all groomers look like. There is a very sinister faceless figure. A figure of a man with his hands up in a way that appears to be casting a spell.

Faceless yes but with one distinct feature. A beard and no mustache. The beard worn by many Muslim men.

Subtle and not so subtle programming that all these sick beasts are Muslim. No mention of the white grooming gang from Scotland. No mention of the white gang from Darby. And no mention of the various and assorted scum that prey on kids, because the perverts are white. The BNP is not interested in exposing white perverts and murders, this does there cause no good. There whole propaganda machine has no interest in right or wrong. Its only there to stigmatise minority's.

Whilst in the BNP I met a guy whose daughter had been groomed. I lost contact with him but hope the trial on the Rochdale grooming gang included the scum that had groomed and raped his daughter.

He came to the BNP when he was let down by his local police force.

He told me a harrowing tale of being visited by a police officer who broke down in tears in his living room because the guilty parties were not even getting investigated. He knew they were guilty but his hands were tied.

I can’t imagine what it must feel like to have your daughter hurt in this way and then for the police ‘who are supposed to protect the innocent’ let you down.

This guy joined the BNP is desperation.

I know he left in disgust when he realised what they were and I sincerely hope he and his family are getting their lives back together.

Not everyone who joins the far right is a racist; some just have no one else to try.

If there is a link to a certain community and sex crimes it needs examined to the full. 

There should be no fear of racism or cultural sensitivities. If it isn't morons like the BNP will get their wish and see whole communities labelled guilty without trial. 

The symbiotic relationship between the far left and the far right

Since starting this blog I have received a few emails asking me why I’m so anti left wing. I should maybe clarify my position. When referring to the far left I’m not really talking about political ideology. It’s some organisations on the far left and the mentality of confrontation that I’m referring to.

When I went to my first BNP meeting I was met by a group of about 20 protesters. Made up of half adults and half kids. The kids mostly under 12 were all holding placards ‘which they obviously didn't write’ calling anyone who attended a Nazi.

I heard one young protester [who looked about eight] ask another person going into the meeting “are you a racist cunt” She looked far too young to even know what she was asking, the words had obviously been put into her mouth.

In the meeting I was told that the local UAF representative Brent Kennedy [a venomous little man] had organised the protest along with the brother of the local Asian Labour Cllr and roped a load of local kids in.  

On entering the meeting this same Brent Kennedy had got in my face screaming ‘Nazi’ at me, I just looked at him in bewilderment ‘who the hell was this nut-job?

I then had to walk past another handful of adults. One in particular [who we came to know as ‘side show bob [the Simpsons character with large hair] got right in my face telling me “you’re not welcome here Nazi” Oh and he was wearing a top hat?

Yeah I was going to take this guy seriously wasn't I?

I thought ‘who the hell are theses idiots and who the hell do they think they are talking to people like this’

This was my first experience of the UAF and unbeknown to them they had already primed me and pushed me further in before I had even attended my first meeting.

I'm like many people when someone gets in your face screaming obscenities it doesn't make you rethink your actions, it pushes you further in.

I had many such run in’s with the UAF [only the other times it was several dozen adults quite often wearing masks, hurling obscenities or spitting at you]. When this happens you don’t rethink your political allegiance, you get angry and focus on them as the enemy.

Then its not the support of the BNP that drives you, it’s your anger at these organisations.

Griffin exploits this to the full to portray the 'them and us' scenario.

I think if it wasn't for the UAF I would have had an even shorter relationship with the BNP.

The likes of ‘searchlight’ and ‘hope not hate do some good work exposing the far right ‘although some of it is politically motivated’ but needless to say anything that stops the far right gaining ground is good.

Without a doubt there anti BNP leafleting sessions during an election really do work [I have first-hand experience of this and how it can destroy the voter base] 

But I have a problem with some of their other tactics.

Recently the Muslim debate initiatives [MDI] were to hold a debate with Stephen Lennon/Tommy Robinson out of the EDL.

The MDI are exactly what the name implies they debate issues regarding Islam. One major criticism of Islam is that they are not open to debate. Here we have an org like the MDI who are open to debate and the far left UAF along with groups such as searchlight and hope not hate did the usual tactics of harassment and threats until the event was pulled.

Why do they do this?

Debate is a must in a healthy democracy. Even amongst people who would like to see democracy end.

As far as I'm concerned people like Nick Griffin, Anjem Choudary and Tommy Robinson need to be exposed on a regular basis. 

Put them on the TV but put them on and ask them the right questions!

When Griffin was on question time the far left went into overdrive. Hundreds demonstrated outside the BBC. There were clashes with the police and this resulted in loads of messages of support coming through to the office. Again the victim status was working and the BNP hierarchy loved it.

Hours later was Griffins moment in the spotlight. It was priceless and he was shown up for the racist holocaust denier that he is. 

I quit the next day but more importantly the BNP voter base collapsed. This is proof that the vast majority of the Great British public do not want nationalism.

So why do the likes of  searchlight and HnH not see that this is the way to bring down the BNP. Allow them in the spotlight [organised and with the right questions] give them enough rope then let them hang themselves.

Yes they should protest and leaflet but more importantly people need to see and hear the real agenda from Griffins own mouth.The British people will never flock on mass to them if they hear the fact’s.

To play into their hands and give them the victim status they so crave is ensuring that they remain. Show the public the truth and the likes of the BNP will disappear for good.

If you want to live here learn British history. The absurdity of the citizenship test

Labour MP Sidique Khan is being criticised into day’s daily mail

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2223235/Immigrants-know-MORE-Britain-British-says-Labour-MP-Sadiq-Khan.html

In the article he states that immigrants know more about British history than indigenous Britain’s. He may well be telling the truth, but there’s a simple reason for this. New comers have to learn our history to pass the test, not rocket science that!

As for the test, we seem to have this strange notion that to be British and fit in here you should have a good knowledge of our history! Why?

Why does an immigrant need to know about British history to come here, its nonsense?

This foolhardy test was only brought in to placate the far right. Maybe most Britons don’t know much about British history because they are not that interested. Most have more important things to occupy their time, like Job, income, family etc.

Far right parties are obsessed with history. Now don’t get me wrong history is important.

It explains where we have come from as a society and how we got to the point we are at now. And let’s face it makes good reading. It’s full of intrigue, injustice, murder and corruption.

As a society we can’t ignore history; we have to learn from earlier mistakes.

However’ when it comes to the far right real life politics comes second place to what took place on some muddy field in England hundreds of years ago, push them on politics and policy’s and their ignorance shines through.

Party’s like the BNP revel in the fact that Scotland, Ireland and Wales can celebrate their patron saint whilst English people have to some extent been vilified for wanting to fly a cross of St George or celebrate their patron saint.

Why? Because colonialism and empire although done in the name of Britain, was in essence done in the name of England [simply because England was by far the larger country]. Scotland Ireland and Wales don’t suffer this same stigma, because ‘in many cases’ they were being as subjugated as the rest of the empire.

In many cases it’s this very fact that feeds the far left and is responsible for their collective guilt and there apparent support for anyone who is not English.

This is the one of the driving force behind multiculturalism.

This blatantly obvious difference between the English and our neighbors is exploited to the full by the far right. This is why the likes of the BNP may be British by name but it’s really all about the English. They have very little support anywhere else [and if they do it’s along sectarian lines]

Is it because our neighbors don’t have to suffer this collective guilt about our past and therefore can show there pride in being Scottish, Welsh and Irish?

The times I had to sit through history lessons during BNP meetings. All the time thinking what the hell has this to with today’s problems.

Even David Cameron ‘whilst appearing on Letterman’ was lambasted a few weeks ago because his knowledge on British history was shaky.

So what! I would rather we had a prime minster who knew about modern day politics and economics [the jury’s still out on this one, time will tell and ironically it will be history that judges him on his this]

Surely the citizenship test should concentrate more on a person bringing modern day values and morals to the UK.

For far too long ‘under the cult of multiculturalism we have seen archaic and primitive societal and religious beliefs and practices brought into the country. We need to move away from this ridiculous mind-set that says we cannot criticise other cultures. It should be every modern person’s moral obligation to do so!

It’s not about knowing about Britain in the past it’s about caring about Britain in the future. A future, that secures human rights, equality, fairness and man-made justice.

If it’s a question of whom I would rather settle here I would rather they held modern day values and knew nothing about history.