An atheists view of Islam.

Right here goes nothing. A white atheists view of Islam.

Christ I can hear the name calling already. Armies of apologists getting their typing fingers warmed up to attack me as a racist or Islamophobe.

After all in their eyes I must be one or the other. I can’t be a rational, modern liberal who abhors the partitions that religion causes between people.

I can’t just hate the brutality that is carried out in the name of some made up deity like god or Allah. Or’ I can’t be just a modern human being who doesn't see colour or race, but does see ignorance and stupidity. And I can’t just be modern free thinking person who sees that to marry your daughter of against her will, kill a loved one in the name of some backward idea of what constitutes honour, or to mutilate your own child because you think your daughter is a possession you can do with as you wish is absolutely inhuman, backward and downright ‘EVIL.

Forget culture or tradition and tiptoeing around sensitivities. Islam has many backward and downright evil practices [as has every religion] but’ at this moment in time you would have to be a fool to deny that a vast majority of barbarism, sexism, misogyny and terrorism is ‘on the whole ‘being carried out in the name of Islam.

Left wing appeasers and multicultural cheer leaders can deny this as much as they like but it’s a fact, and yes I’m well aware what is happening in Russia and Nigeria but this post is dealing with Islam.

If I knew an adult who believed in Santa I would be quite within my rights to take the mickey out of him. An adult who believes though that an invisible guy built this world,populated it with all us animals then took off and doesn't show himself; well that’s reasonable behavior isn't it?

Mind you I can take the micky out of the mad Christians and the left will say nothing. Lampoon the many mad far right bible thumping nut-jobs that are having a resurgence in the states and not a word from anti-racists. Have a go at Islam and’ oh hell- I’m Islamopobic and a racist.

The mind-set of orgs like the UAF and HnH exasperate all problems that we have. I’m not talking about rank and file supporters; I mean the organisers; the movers and shakers. They bring absolutely nothing to the table.

I’ve learned from my time in the BNP that you can’t judge everyone the same. Whether that’s members of the BNP, followers of the EDL, UAF, HnH or everyone who worships Allah.

It’s a pity the anti-racists can’t be this open minded?

So what does Islam mean to me?

One of the reasons I joined the BNP was because of Islam. This country is getting less secular, and many times it’s because we are bending over backwards to appease Islam.

The Church of England was, and is on its knees; that’s a good thing. No word of complaint from me or the left there.

But' political Islam was/is growing in strength. I know organisations like ‘Hope not Hate’ and the UAF deny this and dismiss all criticism as Islamopobia but it ‘did/does appear’ to be growing in strength.

Apologies for using the terms ‘is’, ‘was’ and ‘did’ and ‘does’ in such a way that I sound like I’m not sure either way. That's because sometimes I'm not’ but at least I’m being honest and admitting that many times I don’t know the full facts.

BUT’ I do know the perceptions, sometimes rightly or wrongly. In many cases it’s these perceptions that cause trouble. The only way to get rid of many perceptions is through open debate, free speech and criticism.

Islam to me was never about race. It was about morals and ethics.

Society has this ridiculous preconception that if you’re religious you are automatically higher up the scale of ethics and morality than us non-believers. In short you’re a better human being if you believe in a deity!

Just this week a terror suspect fled a mosque in a Niqab. All the media go to great lengths to point out that everyone who knew him was at a loss to understand his behavior and all pointed out that he was very devout man. They say this as if it was weird for a devout religious person to act like this.

Well Bin laden was devout and religious. As is Al-Qaeda ,the Taliban and  Al-shabab. So are the killers of Lee Rigby; need I go on, or do you get my point?

Every idiot that straps a bomb to himself is devout. Screwed in the head; but devout.

Of course Britain is full of many various nut jobs of different race, colour and religion. But the more that is done in the name of Islam the more we appear to bend over and to appease it.

Our political leader’s mentality appears to be “We know that atrocity does not represent Islam, so here take some more special privileges and our apologies for even doubting you”

Again this is a perception and not necessarily the case.

For every atrocity that happens, our political masters and the cultural apologists appear to bend over even further.  Determined that all Muslims should not be branded the same [and quite rightly] yet everyone who joins a political party like the BNP or marches with the likes of the EDL is obviously a racist; and always will be.

It’s these perceptions that get people angry. How much of it is real doesn't change the anger and distrust that people feel. 

It’s what they see and hear, it’s not necessarily what’s true.

All most people have to make up that perception is from the news. So forgive me if I say that it’s very rare that the news says something positive about Islam, and yes I know fine well that the media would rather publish negative stories.

Since I realised I had made a mistake by joining the BNP I do try my best to get an alternative view on most stories. I try to cut through any propaganda and see the truth. But what if you haven’t had my experience and have no reason to doubt what you hear and read? What if your only information is through the main stream media?

What if you’re so angry that you can only see the negative?

This article was not meant to insult any modern practicing Muslims. I am just trying to show the injustices that are dealt out to critics of Islam.  I've met and spoke to many decent liberal Muslims, in fact more decent ones than nut-jobs.

Britain is a multi-race country. It is far far better for it. It is without a doubt one of our strengths.

It is a multi-cultural society and again this very fact has benefited this little Island. But we have to be able to say that certain aspects that come with multiculturalism cannot and will not be tolerated.

To me and many people like me I would rather shout loudly at Islam and take the consequences if it stops one young girl being mutilated, prevents one beautiful young girl being killed by her parents and if it stops the persecution of the many decent ex-Muslims that I have spoken with, and am proud to class as friends.

Perceptions turn neighbors against one another. We need to grow up as a society and face this before it’s too late.

We need a colour blind anti-racist organisation.

When Tommy Robinson turned his back on the EDL the so called anti-racist orgs were stunned. They were also at a loss as to what to do. The ridiculous named ‘unite against fascism’ remained silent. Searchlight voiced a word of caution, but at least stayed open minded as to how it would play out. Stating that the news was good but time would tell but tell if he had really renounced the ideals of the EDL'

The most shocked and by far the most vocal was Hope not hate. They didn't know what to do. One of their main reasons to exist had just thrown and enormous spanner in the works.

Regular readers of this blog will know that I have very little time for these groups. UAF are just violent appeasers of radical Islam and Searchlight and Hope not hate exist to solely go after ‘WHITE’ fascists, bigots and racists.

Hope not hate targets Anjem Choudry because he’s a safe target. He has very few followers so they aren't going to rock their own tiny little Utopian world view that the only bad guys are them nasty whites.

So’ when Tommy Robinson renounced the EDL you would have thought that these orgs would have being elated?

Not so though. They were shocked this has happened.  Robinson was being humanised in the media and this shook them to their foundations. Even worse was the fact that Quilliam had been instrumental in this process.

Hope not Hate in particular found it very hard to figure out where to stand on this. They need racists to exist, hell sometimes if there isn't any they will just invent some! But only white ones!

They wrote a very long winded cautious expose on Quilliam. They couldn't outright call Quilliam [after all their founders and main people are brown skinned-damn what to do] Also Quilliam ‘sadly ‘do not get as much support in the Muslim community as they ought to, and Hope not Hate need to prostitute themselves to where the biggest support is no matter if it’s right or wrong.

Unlike Hope not Hate Quilliam is forward thinking and not afraid to tread on toes. They are fully aware of the problems within Islam whereas Hope not hate ‘looking through its rose coloured glasses’ sees no problem at all with the misogyny, sexism, racism, bigotry, homophobia and cruelty laced within the Quran’; and before I get called an Islamophobe the bible is worse!

Hope not Hate are too busy worshiping at the altar of unreasonable multiculturalism. and their child like image of the world that everyone is good and difference never causes problems.

Tell that to the poor American student in tower hamlets last week who was brutally beaten up by a gang of Asians because ‘he didn't look local’ if that’s not racism then I must have a misunderstanding of what that word means.

Not one mention of this incident on any of the Anti-racist sites.

Likewise whenever a drunken ‘WHITE’ person is videoed on a train [sadly there’s been a few] racially abusing a non-white person Hope not Hate and searchlight are all over it.

Yet strangely the black guy that was videoed several months ago insulting another black woman because she had a mixed race baby never got a mention on their sites.

When Usain Bolt was getting slammed in Jamaica because he had a white girlfriend- not a mention. 

The video of an immigrant taxi driver being assaulted in Saudi Arabia [because he was not Arab] or the one of the servant been abused [again in Saudi] - not a bloody word from them. That’s just a few examples.

When I left the BNP and eventually started speaking out. One of the first people I spoke to was Quilliam. I worked on the article [mentioned several post previous]. I wanted to help crush the BNP so I sent it to the national newspapers to see if anyone wanted to run it. They all got back to me but they were not interested in reasons why normal rational people could drift toward fringe parties such as these. They all said the same thing.

They wanted the dirt on Griffin and Co. Pictures of Griffin and his henchmen running round the office in white robes with burning crosses.

I wasn't trying to finish the BNP by making stuff up. I was trying to finish them by showing the establishment that the BNP gets support because the political elite are ignoring a large section of society.

I have huge faith that the British people are not racist but as a society we need to face up to problems, real problems.

I did email hope not hate and spoke briefly to their 'token' reformed extremist Mathew Collins but that went nowhere. He took the hump because I had been willing to speak to anyone who would listen. But unlike Mathew Collins I wasn't trying to make cash of it. I offered information to anyone free of charge; in fact money was never ever mentioned. Also I couldn't turn round to them and say “I was a vile racist who has had an epiphany and I’m a changed person”

I was never a racist so how could I change?

Unlike the Hope not Hate evangelical ex-BNP/NF member who then went onto write a book and profit from his years of beating black people up, I decided to put mine on a blog! Free to anyone who could use it.

A few publishers did contact me wanting to know what I had, and if it was worth publishing. But I quickly came to realise that what I had was not sensationalist enough, it was just about one guy. Me; If I’ as a liberal minded non racist could gravitate towards the BNP anyone could. I really wanted to show how dangerous it is to ignore people’s fears and anxieties.  Plus at the time I wasn't too sure about the legalities of putting things on a blog-still aren't to be honest, that’s why I don’t mention names many times in this blog.

So here I am .writing for anyone who may be interested. Whether it makes the slightest bit of difference I have absolutely no idea. But one thing I’m trying to stay true to is the principle of fairness, A racist/fascist arsehole is a racist/fascist  arsehole no matter if he’s black white or brown, and I wish we had a colour blind antifascist/racist organisation that I could support.

Nationalists and their obsession with homosexuality.

Just watched Stephen Fry’s “out there”

For anyone who’s not familiar with it, this new series sees Mr Fry travelling the world trying to understand why so many people are threatened by two people of the same sex being together. In the programme he addresses the question. ‘Why are so many people obsessed about the biology of homosexual love making?’
They seem to take it as a personal affront. Two people engaging in a sexual act that does not comply with their own view of sex.

We've all heard and met the odd homophobic nutter, but it was only in the BNP that I saw it on a regular basis.
Griffin, Jefferson, in fact-all of the hierarchy. They’re obsessed with it. Too hear them talk it’s as if two guys had come up to them raped them or made them watch. Some of them with even the mention of homosexuality would spin out of control and start emitting such sounds of disgust; it really has to be seen to be believed.

There was one openly gay guy in the BNP. The leadership just used this guy as a token “look were not homophobic we have a one in our ranks” but behind his back it was ‘puff this’ or ‘faggot that’.
And’ as usual the BNP have a conspiracy for everything; even homosexuality.
They don’t just say we don’t agree with homosexuals. There has to be a far darker reason why they deplore them so much.
 ….”The Marxists are behind it. They are trying to destroy the family by turning everyone gay”.
 “They are purposely putting chemicals in our food to turn us all into raving queens”.
And the best one.
‘They are doing this only to white people in an effort to stop us 'whities' breeding and therefore die out!. Even David Icke doesn't think his lizard men are that bad !
To these idiots-Civil-partnerships, gay marriage, adoption by a gay couples, gay pride. All of these are used to neuter the white male and let them damned dark skinned people out number us. Then when they do 'god help us' they will be coming for us!
You really couldn't make this shit up

To nationalists ‘as usual’ the biggest culprits are the teachers. They are promoting homosexuality to help this pre-fertilisation genocide of ‘our race’. I kid you not.

They can’t see that no one is promoting same sex. Teachers are just promoting tolerance. There not telling kids ‘hey. be gay, it’s great’ they are just telling kids there’s nothing wrong with being gay. 
Huge difference.

Russia, Uganda, most Muslim countries and nationalists are all terrified of homosexuals.
I agree with the theory that when a man exhibits such fierce homo phobic vitriol it’s because he’s so damned scared of his own feelings and thoughts he has to be the one who shouts the loudest in condemnation. 

It’s embarrassing how thousands of men get so angry about this subject. What are they afraid of?  This same theory argues that these very same men may join such sub-cultures as football or motorcycle gangs, indulge in violence and lots and lots [far too much] of male bonding?
Perhaps most would be happier to just come out.

A very senior official [before he joined the party] was known to have enjoyed [how shall we say] adult parties. At these parties it was [again, how do I put this] ……acceptable practice to grab hold of the next person to you [male or female] and ………….enjoy yourself!
Apparently this is common knowledge in the area where he lives.

This very same official constantly talks about gays ‘a lot’ and says such things as “I don’t give a shit what gays do but they should keep it to themselves, it’s not bloody natural”
Well as far as I know, they do keep it to themselves…unless of course you buy the DVDs Mr official.
And hey, if parties like that float your boat good luck to you, enjoy yourself; but don’t be a hypocrite.
 

So Griffin, Putin and all the other homophobic politicians, Muslim leaders and African Christians; come out of the closet and enjoy life.
My apologies to the gay community. You maybe don’t want these sexually inadequate men anyways.

As usual regular readers of this blog will know that I’m no fan of so called antifascist organisations either. Where are they when homophobic Imams and ‘dark’ skinned world leaders are espousing irrational hatred against homosexuals?  

Ahh well there’s the rub.
They only ever attack white bigots; white Christian bigots.
As usual they are terrified [on the whole] to attack the large homophobic bigots that Islam is absolutely full of. Or the many African leaders who are trying to take their countries backwards.
But then again we can’t expect any more from this bunch of post-modern cultural apologist cowards that call themselves anti-fascists or anti-racists!

A bit more on the BNP in regards to the EDL news

Yesterday while everyone was watching Robinson, Carroll and Quilliam. I was watching Nick Griffin.

Several times I have stated that Griffin is insanely jealous of the EDL. He craves to be that kind of figure head, leading an army of 'angry white men'.

Since the EDL formed he has bounced back and forward from ridiculing them and calling them 'Zionist puppets' to holding out the olive branch in the hope of a merger.

It costs nothing to be a member of the EDL; there is no membership. Thousands of angry men 'thinking' they are taking affirmative action against radical Islam and paying nobody for the privilege. Griffin has been spitting feathers since their inception and all the money he could have made.

I've already said that Griffin will emulate the EDL next year. At the moment he is an MEP. This will come to an end next June. With the office of MEP and being a political party he has to operate within legal, moral and ethical parameters. Next year he will no longer have this restriction. He has realised that as politics go he and his fringe party are finished.

Bring on phase 2.Back to the days of street protests.

When he first started out he was National front. He was actually largely responsible for taking the protesters of the streets and getting them involved in politics.

He thought he could gain power and influence that way. That's all been for nothing. His party is virtually gone.

I think he will go back to the old days of marching and trying to provoke this race war he spends hours dreaming off.

He genuinely believes that this war is coming and he will carried aloft by the downtrodden 'white people of Britain' to save them in their hour of need. Lunatic!

He has tried to organise some street demos but they have been quite pathetic in their numbers. Like-minded People have had the EDL to march behind and he's ended up being stood on the sidelines, watching, fuming and thinking what may have been.

Even after the evil murder of Lee Rigby, Griffin couldn't summon up more than a few people. He tried to get people up for a march [with him at the front of a motorcade saluting and waving to his legion of admirers] but to no avail. A couple of dozen acolytes ended up showing up as he laid a wreath.

In comparison the EDL had mass protests all over Britain!

So will the EDL stay as it is or will it fracture into regional units? I think Griffin would prefer it broke up. He has already forged alliances with such EDL factions as the 'North West infidels' and the 'English volunteer Force'. He will be hoping to do the same again with any newly formed extremist groups.

If the EDL does remain as a national protest group he will desperately try to forge alliances with the new leadership. Of course this all depends who and if, anyone takes over?

Ironically the one thing that stopped Griffin and Co getting their dirty hands on the EDL was Robinson and Carroll. They would have nothing to do with him. Well now they have gone and just watch this space.

What now for Tommy Robinson?

Tommy Robinson and Kevin Carroll have left the EDL. SO’ what now?

I’m not privy to any information about the whys and wherefore about how this happened [despite the timing of my post on Monday; purely coincidental] but all I can say is ‘if they are genuine’ good luck to them. They are working with the forward thinking ‘Quilliam foundation’ that will mentor and guide them on another path.  After all who better to guide someone away from an extremist organisation than someone who were once themselves members of extremist organisations?

I watched Robinson on ‘Newsnight’ and thought he came over well. But’ I didn't like what he said about halting Muslim immigration. That’s the last thing we should be doing. We need to continue welcoming refugees and asylum seekers from anywhere, but we must insist that they leave their cultural baggage where they fled from.
By this I mean archaic customs such as Sharia law, Forced marriages, FGM and other such Stone Age practices, that we in the west 'should' find abhorrent.
We need to get past culture. It’s about acting as 21^st century human beings. The only question immigrants need to answer.
Do you want to live in a secular, free, equal and modern society?

 

So now it all depends what Tommy Robinson’s politics are as in how he casts of his past?
If he joined Labour his past would be forgiven overnight. EX BNP and NF members appear to have become extremely clean by supporting them? They can even write books about the violence they participated in towards black and Asian people. But because they have adopted and embraced the post-modern cultural apologist mantra of unrestricted multiculturalism they are clean.
The left never expose ex far-right people in the ranks of Labour, but will use them joining another party to attack it. After all Anti-fascist organisations are strongly linked to the unions and the Labour party. That’s a fact.

Whilst in the BNP I saw how these organisations worked. They undoubtedly do parties like the BNP harm but first and foremost they are political. I've already mentioned that the Tories and liberals treat me [on the whole] well. The bile and hate that comes from Labour and their political partners has to be seen to be believed.
I still get some now just walking down the street by some antifascist Muppet who doesn't know I quit, and I’m only know in my town. Robinson and Carroll have national recognition.

The antifascists leaflet on behalf of the unions and Labour. After all, its Labour votes that the BNP was taking, because it was the working classes that had been let down by Labour. None of the other parties ever put third part leaflets out against the BNP. They tended to take on the BNP directly. The way it should be done.   

The antifascists need an enemy. It was mentioned in the Quilliam press conference that Robinson may be setting up a new political party. If he is a threat to Labour votes he will find himself back under the antifascists radar, and if he even mentions immigration or any questions to do with Islam, again  he will find himself back in the spotlight as a fascist.

There is nothing wrong with having these conversations but we are, and need to be very cautious about who is having them and why?
That is not a veiled word of caution about Robinson. That should apply to anyone. It’s not about the conversations and questions we should be having.  It’s about the agenda behind them.

Also’ Just a word on Griffin! I mentioned in the previous post that Griffin loses his seat next year. No more money, very few members.
I said he would move more to the EDL strategy of street protests. Well I think he may have been forced to move his grand plan forward after Tommie’s resignation. He is falling over himself on all social media to get as many EDL over to him as possible.
Some will no doubt go over to the BNP. But many will go the same way as the BNP when it fractured a few years ago. Lots of little wannabes setting up different groups, fighting each other for supremacy.

Am I left wing or right wing? Help me someone.

I wrote this a few weeks ago and seeing as how Mehdi Hasan has declared war on the daily mail, and they in return, on him; I thought this would be as good a time as any to put on my blog.

There is a mind-set that you have to be in one political camp or another. You have to be right or left wing. Most people are neither but in many cases the politicians, policy makers and people who have real influence on society are. Quite often the worst offenders are the political activists both online and in the real world.

If your right wing you have to have a go at ‘liberal democracy and ‘woolly minded liberals’ [Their words, not mine]

If your left wing you have to arrogantly look down your nose at anyone that doesn't believe in a bloated state and public sector.

This mind-set even tries to dictate which newspapers you should read.

If your right wing you have to despise the guardian and dismiss everything that’s in it as PC, Britain hating, claptrap, and that these people can’t get out of bed in the morning because of a lack of a backbone.

Likewise if your left wing you have to sneer constantly at anyone that reads the daily mail. Dismissing them all as nutters, racists and closet Nazis!

Well here’s a question. What if you read both papers online [and many others]several times a week [I wouldn't buy them because I don’t want to help them peddle some of their rubbish, plus I quite often have to Google a DM story to see if its true, recent or even relevant]

So does what I read make me a lefty, pc, woolly liberal, Britain hating, patriotic Nazi, racist, bigot?

Wow what would one of them look like?

For some reason to be a ‘socially conscious nice human being’ you have to attack papers such as the DM as often as possible. If you don’t well obviously you’re a right wing nut-job.

Similarly the Guardian; according to the right wing ‘Is read by lentil eating, humus smelling goat breeders who drive Citroen 2CVs and live in their own hair’.

So ‘my argument is this. How on earth can you get a realistic perspective on life if your information comes from one socio-political base?

No newspaper is totally bad. If you only ever read the daily mail ‘god help you’.

It must be hard to get out of your bed in the morning because of all the Muslim terrorists, African rapists and Romanian muggers hiding behind your bins. That’s assuming you have a bin because of all the unemployed scroungers and refugee’s that may have stolen it!

Likewise’ If you read nothing but the Guardian.  Again ‘god help you’. You must believe that Britain is responsible for all the worlds’ ills and terrorists are just misunderstood freedom fighters and there’s a government conspiracy behind everything.

Sometimes the very reason a newspaper runs a story is to prop up its political bias. But if the story is true it doesn't matter who publishes it. It’s still true.

From Nationalism to rationalism.

In this blog I've tried to show at length how and why someone would join the likes of the BNP.

When you get angry and despondent enough with the political system your ears begin to open to anyone’s message, no matter how bigoted it may be.

But what about the journey back. The one that takes you back to the real world. The world of human beings rather than flags and culture.

When I realised the BNP was not for me. That their message was full of intolerance and bigotry. I didn't just think “phew that was a lucky escape” and walk away with a completely different mind-set.

It’s not that easy.

When I got angry and joined the party, with membership came the propaganda .The flag, St George, over infatuation with historical events etc.

I have to admit I never really bought into any of it, but it was expected so I kind of went along with the flow. And yes up to a point I did fall for some of the crap.

So what do you do when you walk away? Just go back to normal life.

No you feel like ‘okay I got that wrong but I still feel strongly about many things that they feel about’. So after a time of readjustment I decided to get active again. I saw a video for the English Democrats. With the slogan ‘were not right not left just English’. Hmm they seem more up my street; maybe I shall give them a go.

So I joined them. After all they were still nationalists but without the racism?[or so I thought] This brief alliance lasted only a few months. Luckily for me the BNP started to implode and many of the hierarchy jumped ship to this party. The way that they were so easily accepted proved to me that British Nationalism or English Nationalism, it didn't matter, both were backward and regressive. So I was politically homeless again.

A few months go by then there was a UKIP meeting in my city. Off I went to this. 

‘Could these be the ones? Definitely not racist. Just wanting away from the European Union and all the rubbish that comes with it!

This relationship was even shorter. I quickly came to the conclusion that it was just a club for Euro skeptics who didn't really do anything. No local politics no campaigning etc.It was anti-Europe but really didn't have any plan for after Europe.

Now many people will call me for all this jumping ship. But to me it was learning curve and in a way ‘deprogramming’ I was venting all the anger I still felt against the political elite but in a more positive way. After all I had gone from the openly racist BNP to the covertly racist English Democrats, then to the Europhobic UKIP. Even if there were somewhere else to go- I had had enough!

When I left the BNP in disgust I had to re-evaluate myself. I had to find what my politics were. I can imagine it’s what someone who has just turned their back on religion must do. You won’t just wake up one day and think well that’s all a crock of shit isn't it. Smile and get on with your life.

I should imagine many people have to go on a journey until they find something they are comfortable with. Thought processes are not that easy to get rid off. No matter how short a time you've nurtured them.

The reason I started this blog was to try and show that nationalism in any form no matter how watered down, is bad. It’s divisive regressive and holds us as people back.

Flags are just pieces of coloured cloth. Culture is just something that our parents and grandparents have instilled into us. More often than not this too is divisive and regressive as well.

Religion; well that is just the most evil control structure that mankind has ever come up with.

All of these do one thing and one thing only. They separate us from our neighbors. From our cousins in other countries. And most of all from peace, both within ourselves and in the wider world.

One final thing does this mean I’m a sell out and that I've changed my political ground from right to left. No not at all.

I’m neither. I was never right or left to start with. We want to put people in boxes. Left or right. Why?

I want open borders, free movement of people an EU that is not corrupt and is democratic. But unlike the post-modern left and cultural apologists I’m a realist.I take into account human nature, and don't think every single immigrant that comes here wants to live in a free society.Or that we have to bend over backwards to accommodate stupid archaic belief systems.

These idealistic fools have created most of the problems we face in the west, mass immigration ,Islamism to name but two.And the most most divisive issue of them all; multiculturalism. I would rather Britain was a nation of people, just people. Not a nation of White communities,Black Communities or Muslim communities.

Wouldn't it be good if rather than people taking extreme sides of the argument? We could actually put our efforts into finding solutions that work?

To paraphrase the so called civic nationalists of the ‘English Democrats’.

I’m not left not right just human.